On a Wednesday morning in September 2022, a lobbyist reached out to a congressional staffer in Washington, DC. He needed to arrange a gathering on behalf of his consumer to debate some human rights issues in Pakistan and a newly launched decision in the USA Home of Representatives relating to spiritual minorities in India.
Throughout the assembly a couple of weeks later, the consumer made an attraction: Might the congressional workplace the place the staffer labored again a ban on sustainment packages for F-16 fighter jets bought to Pakistan because of that nation’s alleged persecution of its Hindu minority?
This consumer was not a international authorities or a defence coverage suppose tank. It was a home nonprofit referred to as the Hindu American Basis.
The staffer was greatly surprised. Regardless of being aware of the group and its advocacy on behalf of Hindus within the US, the staffer didn’t count on it to be so deeply concerned in geopolitics.
The Indian authorities at the moment had been publicly pushing again towards a $450m F-16 package deal for Pakistan. India’s defence minister had expressed concerns about it to his US counterpart, and the exterior affairs minister had overtly disparaged the US authorities for the package deal.
“In that second”, the staffer mentioned, “it turned clear to me that the Hindu American Basis was performing on behalf of the Indian authorities.”
The inspiration, also referred to as HAF, emerged 20 years in the past as a voice for the Hindu neighborhood in the USA. It wasn’t fashioned to champion the Indian authorities.
However since Narendra Modi turned prime minister in 2014, HAF has ramped up its political actions in favour of the Indian authorities, which is led by Modi’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Social gathering (BJP).
It has emerged, regardless of its claims of “nonpartisanship”, as an efficient advocate of the BJP, trying to affect the US authorities by conferences with members of Congress to push for the passage of a number of items of laws on essential features of US international coverage associated to India.
Its founders, board members and a parallel political motion committee – the Hindu American PAC – have made vital contributions to the election campaigns of legislators who’ve in flip supported HAF’s lobbying efforts on these points.
All through this time, HAF has maintained a comfy relationship with the Modi authorities. It has acted within the US to counter the Modi authorities’s critics, collaborated with the Indian embassy on occasions and programmes, and corresponded with the embassy on delicate issues.
But in public, HAF distances itself from the Indian authorities and the BJP. It vehemently refutes allegations that it acts on their behalf, reiterating that its members are merely Hindus engaged within the US political course of and calling any allegations of presidency collusion “dual loyalty slurs”.
HAF seems to be treading a high-quality line. Its actions in favour of the Indian authorities, coupled with its continued collaboration with the Indian embassy, elevate questions as as to whether it ought to register as a international agent below the International Brokers Registration Act (FARA) of 1938.
Registration as a international agent is required any time an entity represents the pursuits of a international principal earlier than any company or official of the US on the principal’s behalf.
The definition of a international agent in US regulation consists of “any one that acts … on the order, request, or below the course or management, of a international principal … and who immediately or by some other particular person engages inside the USA in political actions for, or within the pursuits of such international principal.”
“Lobbying for particular international coverage points would clearly qualify as ‘political actions’ below FARA,” mentioned Benjamin Freeman, director of the Democratizing International Coverage programme on the Quincy Institute suppose tank. “The edge within the statute is merely doing work on the ‘request’ of a international principal,” he added.
However HAF just isn’t registered below FARA, although it has pushed the BJP authorities’s agenda earlier than members of the US authorities.
“The mere undeniable fact that our positions overlap with these of a international principal just isn’t sufficient to point out that we’re a international agent,” Mat McDermott, HAF’s senior director of communications, mentioned in an e mail. “HAF just isn’t affiliated with the Indian authorities or the BJP in any method.” (HAF’s full response to Al Jazeera might be learn right here.)
The early years
One of many first political actions undertaken by HAF befell in 2005 when the US Division of State denied Modi a visa after interreligious violence erupted whereas he was chief minister of the Indian state of Gujarat. HAF issued a press release condemning the choice, calling it the product of a “coordinated marketing campaign” by the Indian left-wing and their US supporters to vilify Modi and the BJP.
“It was clearly a horrible chapter in Indian historical past. However you simply have this concentrate on Hindu violence, however not Muslim violence,” Suhag Shukla, government director of the Hindu American Basis, informed this reporter in an interview.
“Unexpectedly, [the narrative] shifts to ‘Hindus are harmful and violent, and so they’re anti-Muslim.’ It’s undoubtedly compiling and compounding the detrimental portrayals of India.”
This was HAF’s first foray into Indian politics. Within the years that adopted, it largely centered its consideration on home advocacy for Hindu causes.
In Might 2005, HAF and different Hindu teams proposed greater than 117 edits to California textbooks that tackled India and Hinduism.
In 2007, the group rallied round a Home decision that for the primary time would recognise the competition of Diwali. In 2008, it launched the Take Again Yoga marketing campaign to advertise and publicise the Hindu roots of yoga.
Nonetheless, 2013 marked a noticeable shift in HAF’s lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill in favour of Modi, the prime ministerial candidate for the BJP within the upcoming Indian nationwide elections.
Gaining floor
HAF on its web site says it’s politically agnostic and nonpartisan. Its standing as a nonprofit bans it from making donations to candidates.
Its board members and executives, nevertheless, are on the board of the Hindu American Political Motion Committee (HAPAC).
“There isn’t any practical overlap between these two impartial organizations nor significant communication. It’s common and fully inside the confines of US 501(c)(3) regulation for members of nonprofit boards to additionally serve on boards of political motion committees of their private time,” McDermott mentioned.
Though the 2 teams are usually not formally affiliated with one another, all however two board members of HAPAC are a part of HAF in some capability.
HAPAC has spent almost $200,000 on marketing campaign contributions because it started making donations in 2012.
Donors to HAPAC through the years embody a lot of HAF’s board members, similar to co-founder Mihir Meghani and his members of the family.
Meghani was additionally a co-founder of the Hindu College students Council, an organisation affiliated with the BJP. He was HAF’s prime donor, based on its 2018 tax disclosures in Florida. He donated greater than $500,000 that 12 months.
Shekar Reddy, a trustee of the World Hindu Heritage Basis, was the second-largest donor. In 2022, that group was discovered to be elevating cash for the demolition of “illegal” Christian churches in India.
Like Meghani and Reddy, different prosperous Hindu Individuals have contributed to political campaigns by HAPAC. These embody Ramesh Bhutada, an industrialist who has pledged greater than $1m to Hindu organisations and causes, together with HAF, by his household basis.
Bhutada can be a director of Sewa Worldwide and former vp of the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh. Each organisations, which function within the US, are a part of the “Sangh Parivar”, a gaggle of organisations affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), which is the ideological fountainhead of the BJP.
These political donations have helped rally help for Hindu and Indian geopolitical causes.
HAF’s founders and donors have additionally campaigned for political candidates.
“Ro Khanna is operating for the US Congress towards Mike Honda. Honda wrote a letter asking the State [Department] to disclaim Modi a visa,” Mihir Meghani wrote in a 2013 e mail on a Google group.
“It’s crucial that as Indians and Hindus that we help Ro. As a part of my dedication, I’ve given the utmost donation of $5,200 to solely [two] candidates this 12 months – Tulsi Gabbard and Ro Khanna, and I hope that you’ll give your most help to him as nicely.”
Meghani didn’t reply to a number of requests for an interview despatched through e mail and the social media platform X.
Making method for Modi
Even earlier than Modi was formally introduced because the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate in September 2013, the tide was handing over his favour. The Brookings Establishment suppose tank referred to as him India’s most admired and most feared politician, and numerous opinion items about his recognition featured prominently in US and worldwide media.
However on the similar time, the Hindu-Muslim riots in his state remained a darkish stain on Modi’s document.
In 2013, Consultant Joseph Pitts, a Republican from Pennsylvania, launched a decision reaffirming the US authorities’s choice to not grant Modi a visa. Based on an unnamed congressional staffer who spoke to India’s Outlook journal: “Every workplace who signed the decision obtained a go to from HAF … HAF just isn’t selling Modi, however they’re making an attempt to undermine anybody in Washington who’s essential of Modi.”
On Might 26, 2014, Modi was sworn in as prime minister. Quickly after, his visa ban was lifted.
The primary time period
HAF stepped up its pro-Modi actions as soon as he was elected prime minister in 2014. In 2016, it organised a convention name with Consultant Keith Ellison, a Democrat from Minnesota and one of many 25 lawmakers who had sought a ban on Modi’s visa, “to make clear his contested document over laws relating to India”, based on the India Put up. The decision included numerous organisations, together with the Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America, a US-based nonprofit.
It additionally featured a person named Bharat Barai.
Barai, who would later sponsor a fundraiser for HAF and register as a international agent on behalf of the consul basic of India, “particularly requested Ellison about his diatribe towards Narendra Modi and happenings in Gujarat”, India Put up reported. He supplied to journey to Washington to speak to Ellison’s employees to provide them a “clear image” of how Modi dealt with the riots.
On a cloudy Sunday afternoon in June 2017 in Washington, DC, the Indian embassy organised a welcome reception for Modi. Greater than 70 volunteers helped out on the occasion. Some had been from the Washington Management Program, a nonprofit devoted to putting South Asian college students in congressional internships. Others had been from the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh, the worldwide arm of the BJP’s ideological dad or mum. The remainder had been from HAF.
“Congrats to HAF, HSS and WLP management for the coordination efforts,” Roopal Shah, one of many coordinators of the occasion, wrote in an e mail addressed to the volunteers. “Grateful to the Embassy and to the Indian Authorities for permitting us to be part of this occasion.”
McDermott denied that HAF had ever collaborated with the Indian embassy for Modi’s visits “in any particular method”.
He maintained that HAF would welcome leaders of any Indian authorities no matter occasion affiliation.
The BJP has no scarcity of allies within the US. One among them, the Abroad Associates of BJP, a registered international agent, has the acknowledged goal of “projecting a optimistic and proper picture of India and its folks within the US and international media and correcting any distortions within the media’s reporting of present occasions going down in India”.
Whereas that is the Abroad Associates of the BJP’s acknowledged objective, it is usually a strikingly correct description of HAF’s actions.
In February 2017, because the Modi authorities was being criticised for fanning spiritual ethnonationalism and fomenting violence towards spiritual minorities in India, HAF wrote to the US Fee on Worldwide Spiritual Freedom. It requested the retraction of its report on the persecution of Indian spiritual minorities. It additionally requested the commissioners to have interaction with HAF’s leaders “relating to the Fee’s continued misrepresentations of India’s spiritual range, authorized system, and political dynamics”.
In July 2018, alongside the beginning of Modi’s re-election marketing campaign, HAF launched a coverage assertion at a Capitol Hill briefing. It detailed the methods by which the federal government of India had supplied “unprecedented spiritual lodging to its spiritual minority inhabitants”.
HAF’s report supplied a strong defence of Modi’s insurance policies and denied widespread stories that minorities had been being persecuted.
But it surely denied having acted in collaboration with the Indian authorities.
“We’ve got totally different members of HAF employees who in all probability have relationships with members of the Indian authorities,” McDermott mentioned. “However there are not any weekly, month-to-month or yearly calls. There isn’t any coordination in anyway.”
The Abroad Associates of BJP didn’t reply to an interview request submitted by its web site.
Again in workplace
A month after Modi was sworn in for his second time period as prime minister, HAF carried out its annual Advocacy Day on Capitol Hill, throughout which greater than 80 of its representatives held conferences with greater than 100 Home and Senate places of work.
In these conferences, these representatives urged legislators to cross a decision that may elevate India to a significant non-NATO ally (MNNA) of the US. Makes an attempt by the Indian authorities to be elevated to this particular standing haven’t been made public though pro-BJP Indian suppose tanks have been campaigning for such a transfer.
As well as, HAF’s representatives, because the organisation mentioned on its web site, met dozens of senators simply “hours before” they started debating the Nationwide Protection Authorization Act. One of many amendments – to bolster US-India relations – was efficiently handed.
“India’s designation as an MNNA, at any time when that occurs, shall be a symbolically vital push inside American bureaucratic decision-making to prioritise India,” Sameer Patil wrote in July 2019. Patil is a former fellow of the Worldwide Safety Research Programme of Gateway Home, a international coverage suppose tank in Mumbai.
Quickly after Modi’s re-election in 2019, HAF, in collaboration with the Home India Caucus, carried out one more Capitol Hill briefing attended by staffers from greater than a dozen Home and Senate places of work and federal businesses. The Home India Caucus is a gaggle of congressional representatives with the shared goal of legislating on points associated to India.
Titled “India’s Democracy in Motion”, the briefing supplied an evaluation of the not too long ago concluded basic election in India. The occasion featured remarks from a secretary of the Indian embassy.
HAF, in impact, had supplied a platform for an Indian authorities official to satisfy with US congressional employees.
“Everytime you’re placing folks in the identical room as US officers and also you’re making an attempt to affect the officers in relation to a international coverage with a international authorities, that may be a big FARA set off,” Freeman of the Quincy Institute mentioned.
Through the years, HAF has additionally carried out closed-door classes for members of Congress. In a single such session in 2022, it offered 4 Kashmiri activists who supported the repeal of Article 370 of the Indian Structure, which granted semiautonomy to the state of Jammu and Kashmir earlier than Modi’s authorities revoked it in 2019 – a change authorized consultants termed as unconstitutional.
This session got here on the heels of 60 incidents of crackdowns on Kashmiri journalists recorded by Amnesty Worldwide and an web blackout that lasted 18 months – one of many longest in historical past.
“Be relaxation assured that the federal government of India is doing every little thing it might probably to guard the rights of girls,” one of many Kashmiri activists, Yana Mir, mentioned throughout a session. Mir is married to Sajid Yousuf Shah, who heads the BJP’s media division in Kashmir. “Be relaxation assured that the federal government of India is doing every little thing it might probably to guard the rights of journalists.”
In response to a request for remark, McDermott informed Al Jazeera in an e mail that the “description of Yana Mir as an activist is inaccurate. Yana Mir is primarily a journalist. As a result of she could have a distinct viewpoint on Kashmir and the abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Structure than you or Al Jazeera very nicely could make her no much less of a reporter. Your description of Mir as an activist right here comes throughout as condescending and pejorative, and we imagine it’s intentional.”
Notably, HAF’s web site describes Mir as being one in every of 4 activists, and Mir’s X bio exhibits she is the vp of a social welfare organisation.
In December of the identical 12 months, Consultant Pramila Jayapal, a Democrat from Washington state and a Hindu of Indian origin, introduced House Resolution 745, “urging the Republic of India to finish the restrictions on communications and mass detentions in Jammu and Kashmir as swiftly as attainable and protect spiritual freedom for all residents”.
In response, HAF led a marketing campaign towards the decision, calling it “anti-Hindu” and “anti-India”. Later, the group’s web site mentioned it had “efficiently prevented” the decision from being thought of on three events.
“This invoice contained language that was outrightly false and now not related, given the federal government of India’s near-immediate lifting of communications restrictions, restoration of freedom of meeting, and lifting of precautionary curfews,” McDermott mentioned.
However the web blackout in Kashmir lasted for not less than a 12 months after Jayapal launched the decision.
In December 2019, protests towards a new citizenship law rocked India. The regulation granted fast-track citizenship to non secular minorities from India’s neighbouring nations. It explicitly talked about which religions can be coated – Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians. It made no point out of Muslims.
On the similar time, the federal government’s preparations to implement the Nationwide Register of Residents had been below method – a mechanism by which “foreigners” can be recognized, detained and finally deported. Coupled with the brand new citizenship regulation, which might legitimise the citizenship claims of individuals from most religions in the event that they had been declared foreigners, many feared that this train was a solution to render Muslims stateless.
HAF issued a information launch defending the Citizenship Modification Act. It mentioned the act was lengthy overdue and needed, offering respite for persecuted spiritual minorities who’ve sought refuge in India. Since then, it has continued to advocate for this regulation.
A posh entanglement
“We’ve got by no means coordinated with the Indian authorities, by the Indian Embassy in DC or in any other case,” McDermott mentioned in an e mail.
However in a November 2018 e-newsletter despatched to its subscribers, HAF described itself as a “companion group” of the Indian embassy in Washington, DC.
In the summertime of 2019, HAF organised a programme that positioned its interns in congressional places of work. McDermott mentioned HAF supplied housing and a stipend to the interns, who labored on par with different congressional interns “with none oversight from HAF”.
However not all of them had been positioned on Capitol Hill. One of many interns was despatched to work with the Indian embassy.
Collaborations similar to these make it troublesome to gauge the character of HAF’s relationship with the Indian authorities, which is shrouded in secrecy. Regardless of acknowledging that communications between the Indian embassy and HAF exist, the embassy has denied three requests for the contents of those communications, invoking an exemption on the premise of “the sovereignty and integrity of India, the safety, strategic, scientific or financial pursuits of the State, or relations with a international state”.
A few of their communications with HAF, the embassy mentioned, had been “held by the Embassy in a fiduciary capability”.
The embassy has additionally refused to reveal the variety of occasions the events corresponded with one another, which occasion initiated the communications and the extent of the correspondence, even refusing to make clear which a part of the exemption was being invoked.
HAF additionally didn’t remark or elaborate upon its communications with the Indian embassy as requested by Al Jazeera.
In 2022, the Saraiya Household Basis donated $50,000 to HAF, a part of which was allotted for the event of infrastructure to “monitor anti-Hindu components within the media”. The inspiration’s president, Chandresh Saraiya, is the previous president of the South Florida chapter of the Ekal Vidyalaya Basis, a member of the RSS household.
HAF is likely one of the organisations which have arisen within the West lately to marketing campaign towards what it calls Hinduphobia.
When it met the congressional staffer in 2022 relating to the $450m F-16 cope with Pakistan, it had additionally pushed again towards House Resolution 1196, which condemned human rights violations towards spiritual and cultural minorities in India.
“They needed us to insert ‘Hindu’ into that invoice as one other oppressed group,” the staffer mentioned. “I used to be like, ‘I’m a Hindu too, and I don’t suppose that’s credible.’ Would you need to say that ‘Black Lives Matter’ ought to embody white lives, too?”
Angana Chatterji, a scholar on the College of California at Berkeley, identified that whereas folks of Hindu descent could expertise racism, Hinduphobia just isn’t a up to date motion or a rising concern like that of Islamophobia. “Hinduphobia acts to align diasporic Hindu majoritarian campaigns with these of Hindu nationalists in India,” she mentioned.
In September 2021, HAF led a marketing campaign towards a tutorial convention referred to as “Dismantling World Hindutva” and used social media posts, mass emails, petitions and information releases to painting it as an assault on Hindus. “Hindutva,” which means “Hinduness” is a Sanskrit time period used for the Hindu supremacist ideology.
“It’s a tutorial train to critique, possibly even to deconstruct, however dismantling could be very squarely a political exercise,” HAF’s Shukla informed The Washington Put up.
The marketing campaign and ensuing backlash rapidly snowballed with the students scheduled to talk receiving a barrage of on-line hate messages, even demise and rape threats.
A 2022 study traced patterns in customers of Twitter, now generally known as X, whose tweets and retweets featured particular hashtags, retweets, bots, and the frequency of their tweets and retweets over time and linked HAF to a web based community of far-right Hindu teams and the BJP that focused the convention. The research discovered Shukla to be the “largest particular person amplifier of assaults” towards the occasion.
Whereas the convention did finally happen, many individuals withdrew out of worry. HAF was credited for its efforts.
“Dismantling World Hindutva was publicised to be a thunder, however ended up in a whimper, due to [the] efforts of @HinduAmerican [and] different Hindu teams,” Ram Madhav tweeted. Madhav is a member of the Nationwide Govt of the RSS.
He didn’t reply to a request for remark.
Earlier than the convention, HAF carried out a web based occasion. Shukla obtained an viewers query, which she rapidly summarised.
“Somebody has requested if we’ve knowledgeable the federal government of India about this explicit scenario,” Shukla mentioned, referring to the convention. “We’ve got.”
The “scenario” in query that HAF had knowledgeable the federal government of India about, McDermott clarified within the e mail, was that the convention “was being falsely promoted as having official backing or endorsement of the 60+ universities listed, when in reality it didn’t”.
The third race
Within the run-up to this 12 months’s basic election, by which Modi sought a 3rd time period, HAF continued to echo the BJP’s speaking factors.
Thus far, it has efficiently managed to evade scrutiny for its actions.
“On the very least, I believe HAF’s actions would elevate critical questions on the Division of Justice about whether or not HAF must be registered below FARA,” the Quincy Institute’s Freeman mentioned.
The Division of Justice, nevertheless, prioritises circumstances by which cash has modified palms or there may be an precise contract between the principal and the agent. Within the 20 letters of willpower issued by the division’s FARA unit since 2017, there was both a contract in place, a monetary relationship or the proprietor of the agent entity was a international nationwide.
Within the absence of communications between HAF and the Indian embassy, there isn’t any proof that that is the case with HAF.
“Relating to international affect within the US, the Division of Justice is ingesting from a firehose and has to play triage, specializing in probably the most egregious violations,” Freeman mentioned. “To repair this, the DOJ wants extra sources from Congress and the regulation must be modified to take away numerous FARA loopholes.”
Mukta Joshi is a lawyer skilled in India and an investigative reporter at Mississippi Right this moment. Dhrumil Mehta and Sriharsha Devulapalli contributed reporting.
This text was supported by the Toni Stabile Middle for Investigative Journalism at Columbia College’s Journalism College.
