Many new occasions have taken place for the reason that August ninth e mail shared in the latest article on MSG (Ret) Jeremy Brown was written.
Per Federal Rule of Prison Process Rule 43(b)2, it’s Jeremy Brown’s proper to elect to carry his misdemeanor listening to both absent his presence in any respect or by video (Zoom) if he didn’t want to seem in particular person.
The U.S. Authorities sought to oppose Brown’s proper to elect to not seem in particular person, and the explanations which got had been largely targeted upon the significance of an in-person evaluation of Brown’s demeanor being mandatory–regardless of Rule 43(b)2 expressly stating that for misdemeanor offenses punishable by one 12 months or much less, that an individual has the precise to decide on to not even seem in any respect.
The movement to grant Brown a trial by Zoom was denied by Choose Mehta, though the September 4th trial is a bench trial and never a jury trial.
In a choice which flies within the face of judicial economic system, Mehta ordered Brown to be moved from the Citrus County Detention Facility in Florida to the DC gulag, the place Brown is now being held with the overall inhabitants and NOT in protecting custody with the opposite J6ers.
I’ve spoken with Brown and he has emphasised that the circumstances the place he’s being held are “filthy and like a dungeon.”
Why did Choose Mehta imagine it was value the usage of authorities sources to convey whistleblower Jeremy Brown to DC in order that he might stand trial and have his demeanor assessed solely by Mehta himself for 2 misdemeanors?
The transcript of the listening to during which this resolution was made by Mehta is just not but accessible, however it’s reported that Mehta indicated that it was necessary for HIM to have the ability to assess Brown’s demeanor in particular person and that he needed to see his face.
(And, for what it’s value, Ray Epps WAS allowed to attend his sentencing by a DC decide for his plea deal by way of Zoom.)
Why did Choose Mehta, previous to denying Brown’s proper to elect to not seem in particular person per Rule 43(b)2, ALSO deny Brown’s movement to remain the misdemeanor trial whereas there’s nonetheless a pending attraction of the decision for which Brown is presently serving time, and for which the validity of the search warrant is known as into query? That very same search warrant in query is pertinent to the misdemeanor trial, and so the keep ought to have been granted till the conclusion of the attraction.
Why has the U.S. Authorities insisted on bringing Brown to DC for a trial that they solely weeks in the past tried to make go away via the provide of a plea deal? Brown believes that he has been moved to DC unnecessarily with the intent to intentionally place him in hurt’s method.
Why would the federal government undergo the difficulty, the time, and the expense of making certain that Brown is in DC for a trial that they’ve already indicated that they might relatively see go away?
How is that this (above) not an abuse of our justice system? Why is the U.S. authorities responding on this approach to two MISDEMEANOR costs that they, solely weeks in the past, had been providing this whistleblower a plea deal for?
Former Inexperienced Beret Jeremy Brown was advised that if he rejected the plea deal that the federal government would think about including on ADDITIONAL costs.
It now seems like they’re gearing as much as tack on costs of seditious conspiracy or another felony costs which might guarantee a continued strategy of punishment for Brown.
What do “a whole lot of messages on varied Oath Keepers Sign chats” must do with proving past any cheap doubt the alleged misdemeanors? The place is that this coming from?
Why would the federal government, 3 1/2 years after January 6, and after Brown had already spent over 1000 days behind bars, provide a plea deal on a trespassing cost that got here with an implied risk of extra costs if the deal was not accepted?
Regardless of having labeled Brown an unindicted co-conspirator alongside different Oath Keepers who had been charged with felonies, Brown was solely charged with two misdemeanors.
But, it’s clear that the U.S. Authorities is looking for to abuse the judicial course of with makes an attempt to attempt Brown for costs apart from the misdemeanors he’s set to face trial for on September 4th.
As Jeremy Brown typically cites, “The method is the punishment.”
The U.S. Authorities seems to be utilizing no matter they will discover of their arsenal to maintain Brown from talking on the file at trial.
Why? As a result of, in contrast to different J6 political prisoners, Brown can also be a whistleblower who launched a recording of his dialog with the 2 FBI JTTF brokers who tried to recruit him to be a confidential human supply within the days main as much as January 6, 2021.
The recording is out there for the general public to listen to, which has given the Authorities motive to focus on Brown for blowing the whistle.
The audio recording of the JTTF brokers is proof that factors to the involvement of federal brokers with regard to the occasions of January sixth, and to permit that proof to be placed on the file in a court docket of regulation would undermine the U.S. Authorities’s argument that those that have been and who proceed to be charged, tortured, and punished by the hands of our personal authorities are “insurrectionists.”
The recording was not permitted to be heard by the jury when Brown was tried and sentenced for weapons costs ensuing from the unconstitutional raid of his residence, throughout which grenades had been “discovered” in precisely the identical method that the pipe bombs had been “discovered” on January sixth.
They had been “discovered” precisely the place they had been planted as a part of a arrange. Forensic evaluation helps Brown’s claims that the grenades that had been “discovered” usually are not his; however the DNA of two males IS on these grenades. WHOSE DNA IS IT? It isn’t Brown’s.
The U.S. Authorities doesn’t ask questions after they don’t need the solutions made recognized.
That’s the reason, regardless of Brown’s residence raid having been labeled a home terrorism investigation, and regardless of Brown being labeled an unindicted co-conspirator within the Oath Keeper’s trial (to which they unsuccessfully tried to affix his misdemeanor case), MSG (Ret.) Jeremy Brown has by no means ONCE been interrogated by a member of regulation enforcement.
Jeremy Brown is NOT suicidal.
Brown reportedly intends to characterize himself professional se on September 4th earlier than Choose Mehta.
As the federal government continues to attempt to make an argument that this retired 20-year adorned fight veteran is a home terrorist risk, it ought to be stored in thoughts that the FBI reported in mid-January 2021 that Brown was no risk, even noting that he didn’t ever enter the Capitol. (See under)
