I don’t contemplate myself a masochist. But once in a while, I nonetheless learn a New York Occasions article.
Final week, Vice President Vance delivered a brutally frank speech in Germany, castigating European leaders who’ve regularly assaulted the notion of free speech throughout the continent—arresting folks for gentle insults and even nullifying an election in Romania over allegations of “misinformation.”
It was severe stuff. But within the midst of an article about worldwide politics, the Occasions simply needed to remind us: “His first days as a vice-presidential candidate have been consumed by his criticism of ‘childless cat girls.’”
There it was once more—that throwaway comment from a 2021 interview, apparently enshrined within the Occasions’ model information as obligatory background. 4 years later, they’re nonetheless clutching these pearls.
Interested in their fixation, I searched their archives. The Occasions has managed to work that remark into 204 completely different tales. (Seriously, 204 times.) They’ve squeezed it into political evaluation, abortion debates, and opinion items—wherever they might wedge in a reference.
The Occasions’ inventive division labored time beyond regulation, exploring each angle. Usha Vance defends him! Former feminine pals trash him! “JD Vance: Purr-fectly Dreadful.”
However they didn’t cease at journalism-by-keyword. In addition they tried a cultural counterattack, roping in Eminem to battle Vance’s supposed misogyny, working within the cat quote as soon as once more. They sidestepped that the rapper constructed his profession singing about beating ladies.
The paper additionally acquired professorial. One significantly grandiloquent assume piece traced “the lengthy historical past of bias towards cosmopolitan cat-owning ladies” all the way in which again to the Salem Witch Trials of 1692, full with a breathless comparability: “as women have been writhing and convulsing their method to persecution.”
And, in fact, no media circus is full with out superstar endorsements. Fading liberal icons realized the method: invoke the magic phrase and—poof!—a New York Occasions article. Hey, Candace Bergen! Linda Ronstadt remains to be related! Jennifer Aniston, we see you! It was like a retirement residence for progressive stars, with cat girls because the admission ticket.
Then Taylor Swift, ever the advertising and marketing genius, trumped all of them by signing her Instagram endorsement of Kamala Harris as “Childless Cat Girl.” That single stroke of social media genius earned her mentions in 21 separate Occasions tales.
The absurdity hit its peak when the Occasions dragged Doug Emhoff’s daughter, Ella, into the fray, furiously insisting that Kamala wasn’t actually childless: “How will you be ‘childless’ when you may have cutie-pie children like Cole and Ella?”
Kamala almost had three step-children, in fact. In his first marriage, Doug impregnated Ella and Cole’s nanny, spurring his divorce.
How did the Occasions take care of that scandal? Considerably completely different.
Seems, they did do some reporting on the problem. They wrote he had a “beforehand undisclosed relationship” which ended his marriage, however omitted the messy nanny and being pregnant angle. Had there solely been a cat concerned.
The paper’s obsession with Vance’s cat comment is an ideal case examine not of journalism, however in politics.
The Occasions isn’t informing the general public; it’s curating a actuality the place conservatives are at all times villains and liberals at all times victims. On this world, a flippant comment from 2021 is a nationwide disaster, however a vp’s husband impregnating the assistance? That’s simply messy and finest left unsaid.
The irony? Whereas they’ve been obsessing over cat girls, Vance’s recognition has truly grown. Seems, voters who see him unfiltered by the media’s fog machine discover one thing completely different: a considerate chief tackling severe points.
In the meantime, someplace in Manhattan, an editor is already assigning story quantity 205.
Ken LaCorte writes about censorship, media malfeasance, uncomfortable questions, and sincere perception for folks curious how the world actually works. Follow Ken on Substack
