In a latest interview with Rep. Matt Gaetz on One America Information Community (OANN), Chairwoman of the Activity Power on the Declassification of Federal Secrets and techniques, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) forged severe doubts concerning Legal professional Normal Pam Bondi’s forthcoming launch of the Jeffrey Epstein consumer listing.
It may be recalled that final month, Bondi appeared on Fox Information, claiming she’s “actively reviewing” the Epstein paperwork alongside different long-suppressed information on JFK and MLK.
However for Luna and tens of millions of pissed off conservatives, discuss is reasonable—and motion is overdue.
The Florida firebrand took to X to confront Bondi, posting: “AG Pam Bondi, We noticed over the weekend you might be reviewing all information from JFK to Epstein! We’re ALL anticipating their launch! When will they be declassified and accessible to the general public?”
.@AGPamBondi We noticed over the weekend you might be reviewing all information from JFK to Epstein! We’re ALL anticipating their launch! When will they be declassified and accessible to the general public?
— Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (@RepLuna) February 24, 2025
She didn’t cease there, doubling down in a follow-up submit: “On Feb 11 & Feb 19, Home Oversight despatched a letter to the DOJ asking for standing on releasing the Epstein information in addition to JFK, and so on. The DOJ has not responded. Reaching out on X as a result of we will’t appear to get a response from the AG. AG Pam Bondi, what’s the standing of the paperwork? These paperwork had been ordered to be declassified.”
On Feb 11 & Feb 19, home oversight despatched a letter to the DOJ asking for standing on releasing the Epstein information in addition to JFK and so on.
The DOJ has not responded.
Reaching out on X as a result of we will’t appear to get a response from the AG.@AGPamBondi what’s the standing of the…
— Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (@RepLuna) February 25, 2025
A choose group of conservative commentators, together with legal professional Mike Cernovich (who beforehand sued for Epstein paperwork), legal professional Rogan O’Handley (DC Draino), Jack Posobiec, and others, acquired a binder of section 1 of the Epstein paperwork.
This sparked frustration from Rep. Luna, the chairwoman overseeing the declassification of the information, as a choose group of conservative influencers obtained copies earlier than her committee.
She additionally confronted Bondi over the disappointing launch of the preliminary batch of Jeffrey Epstein information.
“I nor the duty drive got or reviewed the Epstein paperwork being launched at this time… A NY Submit story simply revealed that the paperwork will merely be Epstein’s phonebook,” stated Luna.
“THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a whole disappointment. GET US THE INFORMATION WE ASKED FOR!”
I nor the duty drive got or reviewed the Epstein paperwork being launched at this time… A NY Submit story simply revealed that the paperwork will merely be Epstein’s phonebook.
THIS IS NOT WHAT WE OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ASKED FOR and a whole disappointment.
GET US THE…
— Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (@RepLuna) February 27, 2025
Throughout an interview with Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) on OANN on Monday, Luna introduced that she shouldn’t be assured in regards to the Epstein consumer listing launch.
Gaetz requested her point-blank:
“Are you assured, as you sit right here now, that there shall be an Epstein consumer listing that the American folks will see?”
Luna’s response?
“I’m not assured on the Epstein consumer listing as a result of I haven’t had the briefing but from the Division of Justice. I’ll know extra tomorrow on that. However primarily based on what I’m listening to from the legal professional common, she retains saying that she goes to launch one thing, so I’m going to take her at her phrase for that. Now, whether or not that one thing is a full listing, we’ve requested for the total listing. We now have requested for all of the documentation. We’re pushing for max transparency. However once more, we don’t maintain declassification authority. That’s as much as the legal professional common.”
Video through OANN:
