To the editor: Elected officers get political advantages from demonstrating generosity to victims of disasters (“California should move faster on clean energy. Some lawmakers want to take a break,” April 10). Inside the context of local weather change, this could show short-sighted, even counterproductive. Sadly, the extent of common understanding of the local weather emergency is inadequate to guard and defend long-term laws when it conflicts with short-term, anti-climate calls for. That is significantly true when persons are grieving the lack of a house — or a complete neighborhood.
I credit score columnist Sammy Roth for bravely going the place his deep understanding inexorably leads him. Current laws already are inadequate to satisfy the state’s emissions targets. In the meantime, the monetary advantages of Meeting Invoice 306 to owners, if any, is paltry in comparison with the long-term prices of elevated air air pollution (unhealthy), elevated CO2 emissions (warming), sluggish electrification (slowed transition to wash power) and many years of energy-inefficient new and present houses (wasted assets).
The idea of affordability has to broaden to incorporate the price of different neighborhoods going up in smoke, some for a second time. There isn’t any time left for procrastinating on the mandate that the local weather emergency represents. Elected officers ought to stand behind their not too long ago handed, forward-thinking local weather laws.
Gary Stewart, Laguna Seashore
..
To the editor: Meeting Speaker Robert Rivas is on the unsuitable observe, if he thinks he may help California housing prices with a six-year pause on new clear power guidelines. I’ve information for him: World warming is attributable to greenhouse gasoline emissions, and stopping clear power guidelines makes the issue even worse later. Rivas wants to search out different financial savings in housing prices. These may embrace constructing smaller homes and residences at larger densities. Higher metropolis planning can be wanted, beginning with public transportation. World warming is proof against our considerations about decreasing housing prices.
Carl Mariz, Irvine
