As long-serving members of the California Air Assets Board, we’ve prioritized environmental justice and neighborhood well being, championing efforts to fight local weather change. Nonetheless, we imagine state insurance policies should thoughtfully deal with the implications for communities least in a position to bear the related prices.
This concern applies to CARB’s newly adopted amendments to speed up the Low Carbon Gas Normal, or LCFS, which we opposed. The gasoline normal program, established in 2011, goals to scale back greenhouse gasoline emissions from transportation by capping the carbon depth of fuels. The present program mandates a 20% discount in gasoline carbon depth by 2030. The proposed amendments push this to a 30% minimize by 2030 and 90% by 2045.
Sooner implementation, nonetheless, dangers growing gasoline costs — a big burden on low-income communities already fighting prices. This concern has attracted consideration from the media, legislators and the general public. Past monetary considerations, the LCFS has had one other, less-publicized consequence: a dramatic transformation of California’s dairy business.
Over the previous decade, many dairies have shifted their priorities pushed by LCFS incentives, with troubling public well being penalties.
California’s dairy business has traditionally centered on milk manufacturing, however right now, many dairies are producing renewable pure gasoline by capturing methane from manure. The LCFS propels this development by means of California’s carbon credit score system, which goals to scale back greenhouse gasoline emissions. Beneath this program, entities earn and promote credit for reducing emissions, and dairies revenue by changing methane into renewable pure gasoline. Nonetheless, the system rewards larger-scale manure manufacturing, as extra methane generates extra credit and earnings. This creates a perverse incentive, prioritizing pollution-heavy practices over sustainable, low-impact options.
Capturing methane, a greenhouse gasoline over 80 instances stronger than carbon dioxide within the brief time period, is significant for combating local weather change. But, the strategies to realize reductions matter. The new amendments inadvertently incentivize the expansion of mega-dairies now disproportionately concentrated within the Central Valley, the place land is cheaper than different components of the state — a area already grappling with environmental and well being challenges.
As mega-dairies broaden, their impacts on native communities worsen. In line with feedback from the Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability, a local weather, well being and fairness group working within the Central Valley, these services exacerbate air air pollution, groundwater depletion and nitrate contamination, disproportionately affecting low-income Latino communities.
The promise of renewable pure gasoline as a “bridge gasoline” is basically flawed. As an alternative of transitioning towards sustainable decarbonization, the LCFS now encourages the enlargement of large-scale dairies to maximise methane technology. Dairies are rewarded not for lowering methane emissions however for capturing what they generate, perpetuating pollution-heavy practices. Extra waste generates means extra revenue.
Whereas capturing methane contributes to California’s greenhouse gasoline discount targets, the collateral harm is plain. Mega-dairies are among the many largest ammonia emitters, contributing to wonderful particulate matter air pollution that causes respiratory sicknesses and untimely loss of life. The Central Valley, already burdened with a number of the worst air high quality within the nation, can not face up to further hurt. Furthermore, nitrate runoff from manure continues to infect ingesting water, disproportionately affecting deprived communities reliant on home wells.
Accelerating LCFS mandates will solely hasten the enlargement of mega-dairies.
CARB has already undermined efforts to control livestock methane emissions. Whereas we efficiently pushed for rules to start by 2028, a last-minute change allowed mega-dairies to proceed to revenue from “prevented methane” credit based mostly on flawed assumptions, encouraging herd consolidation and pollution-heavy liquid manure methods. Sustainable options, comparable to dry dealing with or pasture-based methods, which generate far fewer pollution, stay unsupported. For these causes, we had been on the dropping facet of a 12-2 vote by the board on the LCFS modification.
Methane is a right away local weather menace, and failure to deal with it might be catastrophic. Nonetheless, ignoring the long-term environmental and social prices of factory-farm gasoline growth prioritizes short-term local weather beneficial properties over public well being and fairness. Our local weather options should not come on the expense of environmental justice.
The LCFS program may very well be improved by capping the scale and variety of dairy operations eligible for methane incentives. With out such limits, we threat entrenching an business whose environmental harms outweigh its local weather advantages.
Moreover, CARB should prioritize sustainable methane discount options, together with practices that scale back air pollution on the supply relatively than perpetuating dangerous methods. Setting these limits would create a fairer and more practical framework for addressing emissions whereas defending weak communities.
Preventing local weather change is not only about dairies. It’s about selecting a path that doesn’t lead to extra hurt to weak communities. For the sake of our air, water, and public well being, we should guarantee our options work for everybody, not simply for many who revenue from air pollution.
Dean Florez, a member of the California Air Assets Board, is a former California Senate majority leader. Diane Takvorian, a member of the California Air Assets Board, is the co-founder and former govt director of the Environmental Well being Coalition in San Diego/Tijuana.
