On Friday, The New York Instances reported that particular agent in control of the Columbia Area Workplace in South Carolina, Steven Jensen, was appointed as Assistant Director of the Washington Area Workplace.
Jensen has a historical past of involvement within the January sixth persecutions and, based on the Home transcribed interview of former Supervisory Intelligence Analyst George Hill, known as J6ers “goddamn terrorists” and pledged that “we’re gonna spherical all of them up.”
In keeping with Hill, there have been “hundreds of individuals” on that convention name.
The New York Instances reported:
However a few of these strikes seem at odds with Mr. Patel’s previous derision of the F.B.I.’s aggressive strategy to Jan. 6. The brand new assistant director Mr. Patel named to run the Washington discipline workplace, Steven J. Jensen, was in control of the bureau’s home terrorism operations part on that day, and he performed a key function in responding to the assault on the Capitol.
Feedback on X, calling into query the choice the appointment originated with the New York Instances reporting.
Now, a high-ranking official inside the FBI has confirmed to The Gateway Pundit that this report on Jensen is, “Pretend Information.”
Steven Jensen was not appointed to guide the Washington Area Workplace.
The Gateway Pundit cited the New York Instances in an article Friday, whereas acknowledging there was no formal announcement on the FBI web site, the Washington Area Workplace’s web site, or social media, nor Director Kash Patel’s social media and calling the transfer “head-scratching.”
The appointment went towards every little thing that each Director Kash Patel and Assistant Director Dan Bongino have represented because the protest on the US Capitol, and towards the “Deep State” as an entire.
It seems, as we’ve confirmed, this report was not true.
The testimony from FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst George Hill in 2023 about Jensen, nevertheless, will not be “faux information.”
The query now turns into, who was the supply of the New York Instances? Was it a ‘smoke out’ or a ‘canary entice’? Or was there ever a ‘supply’ on Jensen’s report in any respect?
