By Alex Xenos for RealClearPolitics
In step with federalist ideas, the Structure provides the states management over our presidential elections, offering a verify on majoritarianism.
For the reason that 2000 presidential election, the left has labored to undermine the legitimacy of the Electoral School, labeling it a relic of slavery. Little doubt, if Donald Trump returns to the White Home whereas once more shedding the favored vote, these assaults will likely be renewed with fervor. In actual fact, it has already begun as commentators denounce the undemocratic nature of the system. Simply final month, the New York Occasions printed a piece trashing the Structure and asserting that the Electoral School’s solely goal was to guard slavery. These critiques are primarily based on misconceptions and hostility towards the very construction of our Structure.
RELATED: Florida Sues Over Violent Foreign Nationals Being Released from Prison into U.S.
The Historical past
Our methodology of electing the president happened via compromise. The framers agreed upon a system that ensured the states had a say in selecting the president. The Structure provides every state a share of electors, and the states resolve for themselves the way to choose these electors.
On the time of the constitutional conference, common elections would have favored the North as a result of the North’s inhabitants of free individuals would have outstripped the South’s. This dynamic is why the South pushed for a system that proportioned the electoral vote primarily based on inhabitants, together with slaves.
However nothing within the Electoral School system inherently favored slavery. You may have had an Electoral School system that didn’t depend slaves as a part of the inhabitants for the aim of distributing electors. Thus, it was the counting of slaves in proportioning electors by way of the notorious two-thirds clause that protected slavery.
In actual fact, even when slavery had by no means existed, the states would by no means have agreed to a way of electing the president that stripped them of getting a say within the matter. Defending state sovereignty and guaranteeing much less populous states had affect have been key options of the compromise. Subsequently, slavery could have been one among a number of causes for the compromise, however it actually was not the cause.
RELATED: ‘Diversity’ Doesn’t Include Disabled Veterans Like Me
The Deserves
The best way state delegations elect the chief govt could have been the product of compromise, however that doesn’t detract from the deserves of the system, which embody geographic illustration and respect for state sovereignty. That is true even in the event you consider the Electoral School is part of slavery’s legacy.
In a nationwide election, in a rustic as giant and numerous as ours, illustration primarily based on geographic segments of the inhabitants is much superior to the mob rule of a purely common vote. We aren’t a monolithic society. Life and views range primarily based on location. That is very true when you think about the variations between state governments, which magnetize various kinds of folks.
America is a gigantic nation, and a system primarily based solely on the favored vote would permit densely populated cities to dominate. This dynamic is especially problematic when one considers that city populations typically need to impose their tradition and coverage preferences on others, whereas rural populations typically need to be left alone. Simply take into consideration how Democrats need just about every thing to be regulated nationally by the feds.
However no matter this left-versus-right paradigm, it’s merely higher to present the completely different geographic components of the nation and the states a voice on nationwide issues to considerably reduce the power of the bulk to steamroll political minorities.
Moreover, as a lot because the left would like to abolish the states, there is no such thing as a United States with out the states themselves. Our federalist system permits for higher illustration of various segments of our inhabitants and, due to this fact, permits for higher governance. The states, as separate sovereigns, will need to have a say in who turns into president.
The Electoral School additionally impacts the politics of presidential campaigns. Candidates are pressured to contemplate the respective views held in several states, significantly of these voters within the much less partisan swing states. This political circumstance has a means of diffusing energy and lessening the deal with densely populated cities, permitting for views exterior of the city thought bubble to take part.
One other common assault on the Electoral School is that it’s undemocratic. However American authorities was by no means meant to be primarily based on democracy. Relatively, democracy was meant to be a part, albeit an vital one, of our constitutional republic. The safety of liberty and the rights of people are way more vital than the power of the bulk to impose their will.
RELATED: Walz Subpoenaed for Oversight of $250 Million Fraud Scheme
Furthermore, the president will not be even speculated to be a consultant of the folks in our constitutional system. That’s what the Home of Representatives is for. Thus, the argument towards the Electoral School is an argument not simply towards our Structure’s federalist ideas however towards the Structure’s separation of powers as nicely.
Our Electoral School system may not be good, however it is much better than an election by direct common vote, which disregards our federalist ideas.
Alex Xenos is an legal professional and a Younger Voices contributor. His writing has appeared within the Boston Herald, The American Spectator, DC Journal, and NH Journal, amongst different publications. Comply with him on X @AMXenos.
Syndicated with permission from RealClearWire.
