A bombshell report from the America First Coverage Institute has uncovered a staggering $100 million in international darkish cash laundered by means of the Sixteen Thirty Fund to bankroll radical poll initiatives throughout 25 states.
The Sixteen Thirty Fund, a infamous hub for progressive causes, has been caught funneling international money into state poll measures concentrating on divisive points like abortion, election regulation, and drug coverage.
In keeping with the America First Policy Institute:
Non-citizens can affect U.S. elections and home coverage by means of donations to poll initiatives. As a substitute of the poll initiative course of being determined by state residents who’re affected by the consequence, international billionaires, usually pushed by an ideological agenda, impose their will on U.S. residents by funneling giant quantities of cash into the poll initiative course of and swaying the outcomes.
FACTS AND NUMBERS
- In 2021, the Federal Elections Fee (FEC) dominated that international nationals can donate cash to U.S. poll initiatives, opening the door to international involvement in U.S. coverage creation.
- To various levels, California, Colorado, Maryland, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Washington have all prohibited international cash in poll initiatives, however typically with the caveat that solely foreign-owned or partially owned companies are prohibited, not international people.
- A 2022 survey from the College of Maryland discovered {that a} “sturdy bipartisan majority of eight-in-ten voters favor Congress banning international people and entities from spending cash to affect poll initiatives”.
- A 2024 report by People for Public Belief confirmed that just about $100 million was spent by one group alone, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, spanning poll initiatives in 25 states.
MAJOR EXAMPLE: OHIO
Greater than $14 million in international cash was poured into Ohio to assist poll measures decreasing penalties for fentanyl possession and codifying radical abortion legal guidelines within the Ohio structure, regardless of 85 p.c of Ohio voters considering that international nationals shouldn’t be allowed to affect poll initiatives. In 2024, as a response, Ohio prohibited international cash in poll initiatives.
WHO WAS BEHIND SO MUCH FOREIGN MONEY SPENT IN THESE STATES?
Throughout a latest section on Fox Information, Dana Perino broke down the staggering implications of this discovery with Caitlyn Sutherland, Govt Director of People for Public Belief, who confirmed that what we’re witnessing is nothing in need of a coordinated international affect marketing campaign designed to bypass U.S. legal guidelines and hijack American policymaking.
From Ohio to Arizona, this international interference has focused susceptible state constitutions, aiming to rewrite election guidelines, develop abortion entry to unprecedented ranges, and even decriminalize harmful medicine.
In Ohio alone, foreign-backed funds pushed for gerrymandering schemes that might have rigged congressional districts below the guise of “defending democracy.”
Transcript:
Dana Perino:
International cash influencing state poll measures has been a recurring drawback throughout the nation. However now, a rising variety of states are lastly cracking down on election loopholes in order that solely U.S. residents can donate cash for these initiatives…That is occurring in plenty of totally different locations the place you’ll be able to attempt to discover a ban for this. Why does this matter? As a result of individuals may not notice that that is even nonetheless occurring.
Caitlyn Sutherland
What we’re seeing throughout the nation is sweeping momentum—states are rejecting international interference of their insurance policies. It’s truly lengthy been the case that international nationals are prohibited from influencing our elections.However after we take a more in-depth have a look at what that really means, we notice that it’s not very complete, and it truly doesn’t apply to poll measures.
That may be a very harmful and alarming international affect loophole. When states study that their insurance policies and constitutions are susceptible to international interference, they’re stepping up, preventing again, taking motion, and passing bans that prohibit international nationals and international governments from influencing and contributing to state poll problem campaigns.
Dana Perino:
100 million {dollars} was spent by the Sixteen Thirty Fund on poll initiatives in 25 states. That’s 100 million {dollars}. That’s in accordance with the America First Coverage Institute 2024 report. What sorts of state initiatives had been they making an attempt to affect? What’s the subject?Caitlyn Sutherland:
It’s one factor to know that this isn’t a hypothetical state of affairs. We have now been capable of hint over $100 million of international cash flowing by means of the Sixteen Thirty Fund in states throughout the nation. They’re working to implement far-left and extremist public insurance policies on points associated to abortion, election regulation, drug coverage, and extra. They’re making an attempt to sidestep the legislative course of and push by means of probably the most excessive model of public coverage potential.Dana Perino:
Why would they need that, Caitlyn?Caitlyn Sutherland:
Effectively, as a result of they know that their far-left agenda usually can not stand up to the scrutiny of a typical legislative course of. So they’re sidestepping that course of, getting these excessive public coverage measures on the poll, and utilizing international darkish cash to do it.Dana Perino:
It’s a horrible drawback. Let me learn this assertion from the Sixteen Thirty Fund to Fox. It says:“Sixteen Thirty Fund is proud to assist poll initiative campaigns which can be working to advance financial alternative, reproductive rights, and democracy. Our donations to those initiatives are made in compliance with native, state, and federal legal guidelines.”
I’m assuming if these bans go into impact in different states, that might finish. I’m simply nonetheless making an attempt to get to the nut of the issue right here, which is—they assist a far-left agenda, however what precisely are they in search of? They are saying they wish to assist reproductive rights, which I’m assuming means extra entry to abortion. However in the case of supporting “democracy,” what does that really imply?
Caitlyn Sutherland:
Effectively, when the left says the phrase “democracy,” that’s their catch-all for “we’re making an attempt to do good issues.” However while you have a look below the hood, you notice that it’s an extremist agenda.We noticed that foreign-backed funds got here into Ohio final yr that might have compelled the state to gerrymander their congressional districts and alter the way in which the state carried out elections.
There’s nothing democratic about utilizing international darkish cash in these state poll problem campaigns. States have woken as much as this drawback and realized that their constitutions and insurance policies are susceptible to the corruption that’s international cash. That’s why we’ve seen such momentum throughout the nation in passing bans that prohibit international funds from being utilized in these campaigns.
WATCH:
