COMMENT: Martin,
I need to admit, I’ve by no means learn NATO article 5 till this morning whereas studying your put up from yesterday.
Wanting on the precise wording, it appears to me that the entire article revolves round one little phrase, specifically “it”. On this case, it refers to every NATO member nation within the case of an assault on another member nation. To summarize:
“…every of them, in train of the correct of particular person or collective self-defence…will help the Social gathering or Events so attacked by taking…such motion as IT deems mandatory…”
Thus, every member nation is neither sure nor sworn to hitch into any assault, however solely sure to take no matter motion it feels mandatory.
For instance, a member nation might restrict its help to humanitarian assist. Moreover, if a member nation believes any NATO nation provoked the assault, or believed the assault was a false flag, then the member nation might “deem” that no motion was mandatory in any respect besides to debate phrases of peace.
You actually have extra expertise within the regulation, however am I mistaken right here?
-DB
REPLY: That could be very appropriate. Trump wouldn’t be sure to hitch WWIII. That’s the reason they’re scheming to attempt to delay his inauguration to allow them to invoke Article 5. Only for the document, the final time Article 5 was invoked was 911 to justify invading Iraq, which had nothing to do with 911 and by no means had weapons of mass destruction. It was Dick Cheney who schemed to invade Iraq, after which they supposed to go proper into Tehran.
It was Dick Cheney who crafted the intelligence, and to cowl his ass, he invoked Article 5 to start out his warfare, which was, I imagine, to overcome the Center East. The US pitched it in October 2001, and as this text quotes, they supplied “clear and compelling” proof. The whole lot introduced to justify this quest to overcome the Center East was a lie, as at all times. They’re getting ready the exact same technique to overcome Russia and divide the spoils of the wealthiest nation on earth when it comes to pure sources.
They’ve lied to start out each single warfare as a result of they get to develop the federal government and line their pockets. They don’t have any regret for the individuals who die in these actions. These individuals who continuously push for warfare are Psychopaths and are categorized as individuals with little or no conscience however can observe social conventions when it fits their wants. They’re much more harmful than a mere Sociopath who can not really feel empathy and regret however possesses merely delinquent persona dysfunction (APD) relatively than a deliberate and conniving Psychopath.
Right here is Lyndsey Grachm for as soon as telling the reality. This isn’t about democracy, and no one cares if any Ukrainians stay. That is about strip-ming Russian property. They may invoke Article 5, and the principle nation NATO is pushing to be the attack-dog is Poland.
