Lucy Letby is serving 15 life sentences for seven child deaths at neonatal items between 2015 and 2016.
The case of a British nurse sentenced to life imprisonment for killing seven new child infants is being reviewed as medical specialists argued there was no proof to assist her conviction for homicide.
Lucy Letby is serving 15 life sentences for the deaths of infants at neonatal items within the northwest of England the place she labored between 2015-16.
Letby was convicted of murdering seven infants and making an attempt to kill seven others on the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit, making her the UK’s most prolific serial killer of kids in trendy historical past.
However her defence workforce on Tuesday utilized to the impartial Prison Instances Overview Fee (CCRC) to probe whether or not there had been a potential miscarriage of justice in her two trials in 2023-24.
Letby, 35, who maintains her innocence, was accused of attacking the infants by varied means, together with injecting air into their bloodstreams that brought about an air embolism that blocked the blood provide.
However Dr Shoo Lee – a retired Canadian doctor who co-authored a 1989 educational paper on air embolism in infants that featured in Letby’s 10-month trial – advised a London information convention that Letby had exhausted all her appeals “and but it stays that the proof was mistaken”.
“The proof that was used to convict her was mistaken and for me that could be a downside,” he mentioned, presenting the findings of a world panel of 14 impartial specialists within the care of younger infants.
Lee mentioned the panel’s conclusion was the proof “doesn’t assist homicide in any of those instances”.
The group of paediatric specialists concluded pure causes or unhealthy medical care led to the deaths of every of the newborns, Lee added.
Letby is “sitting in jail for the remainder of her life for a criminal offense that simply by no means occurred”, her lawyer Mark McDonald mentioned.
“The explanation why Lucy Letby was convicted was due to the medical proof introduced to the jury. That at the moment has been demolished.”
A spokesperson for the CCRC mentioned, “We have now acquired a preliminary software in relation to Ms Letby’s case and work has begun to evaluate the appliance.”
The fee has the facility to refer instances again to the Court docket of Enchantment if it determines there might have been a miscarriage of justice.
