A handful of judges try to cease Trump from enacting his agenda. That is an incontrovertible fact.
Jonathan Turley, a regulation professor at George Washington College, who can be a liberal, lately talked about this on FOX Information and clearly sees this as judicial interference.
His level is easy. The folks of America elected Trump, not a small group of activist judges.
Transcript by way of Real Clear Politics:
HEMMER: So the way in which we body that query the place there’s 650 district court docket judges throughout the nation and what Barr says, a decide in the identical court docket down the corridor might disagree with him. That doesn’t give the unique decide the authority to go over the manager energy. How do you view that?
TURLEY: No, I believe there’s a reputable criticism right here. It’s like having a automobile the place each passenger is grabbing the emergency brake. It’s fairly laborious to drive that automobile.
And, you recognize, what you will have listed here are judges which might be imposing nationwide injunctions which the Supreme Court docket, together with liberals like Justice Kagan, have objected to. She mentioned that is insanity that you’ve got all of those trial judges who’re imposing nationwide injunctions. Congress is laws to curtail the power of decrease court docket judges to do exactly that.
So I believe there’s advantage to that. I believe that the Trump administration is prone to win. I additionally assume the Trump administration is prone to prevail in most of those instances.
I believe that federal judges have overextended themselves. I believe they’ve intruded into areas of Article II or presidential authority.
Watch the clip:
Jonathan Turley: “I believe that federal judges have overextended themselves. I believe they’ve intruded into areas of Article II or presidential authority.”
Learn what @JonathanTurley mentioned: https://t.co/fXgpoMrmto pic.twitter.com/3Cx9SFK9Aa
— RCP Video (@rcpvideo) March 27, 2025
Individuals are uninterested in this. The general public elected Trump for a motive. These judges must get out of the way in which.
