In January, The Gateway Pundit published an exclusive report on E. Jean Carroll and her infamous black jacket costume.
We’re republishing this morning for individuals who missed this report earlier.
Trump was again in courtroom on Friday to face this very unusual girl and her wild accusations that learn like a Regulation and Order episode.
E. Jean Carroll posed for the duvet of New York Journal in June 2019. She was sporting what she claimed was the Donna Karan jacket costume she had worn when Donald Trump allegedly attacked her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in 1994.
She was later pressured to vary her story after New York Journal identified that the costume she stated she was sporting had not been bought in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged assault occurred in 1995 or 1996. However she continues to be not clear on the date it came about. Carroll stated she met Trump on the road they usually determined to go purchase lingerie on the high-end New York Metropolis division retailer earlier than the assault. The whole story lacks credibility.
New York Journal said on its cowl, “The jacket costume she was sporting that day has hung in her closet ever since; she wore it once more for the primary time for her portrait with New York.”
E. Jean Carroll wrote her bizarre story in New York Journal in June 2019. Carroll stated she stored the costume in her closet after the alleged assault. She says she by no means wore it once more and that, “I’ve by no means had intercourse with anyone ever once more.”
She even held a photograph shoot with New York Journal within the costume.
However there was one large drawback with this girl’s story. The Donna Karan jacket costume was not even made or bought in 1994. The story is a whole hoax.
Trump Lawyer Boris Epshteyn spoke exterior the courtroom in New York Metropolis the place the E. Jean Carroll case is happening in entrance of Clinton-appointed Decide Lewis Kaplan’s kangaroo courtroom. Boris instructed reporters exterior the courthouse that the costume E. Jean Carroll stated she was sporting in 1995 or 1996 when Donald Trump allegedly assaulted her was not made in 1994 as she initially said. It isn’t clear when this costume was first out there.
Lawyer Boris Epshteyn: “She stated, that is the costume I wore in 1994. They went again, they checked. The costume wasn’t even made in 1994. And that’s why the date’s moved round. That is the 80s. Is it the 90s? Is it the 2000s? President Trump has constantly said that he was falsely accused and he has the suitable to defend himself.”
This isn’t the primary time Carroll lied in regards to the case. It is usually clear that Carroll lied about who was funding her lawsuit. E. Jean Carroll initially stated nobody was funding her lawsuit in opposition to Trump. Later, her legal professional admitted that billionaire By no means-Trumper Reid Hoffman was funding Carroll’s lawsuit.
The alleged rape came about a very long time in the past, a long time in the past; Carroll can’t even keep in mind the yr it came about.
Right here is the video through The Conflict Room and Midnight Rider.
Now, The Gateway Pundit can verify that E. Jean Carroll testified beneath oath that the jacket-dress was not even bought on the time of the alleged assault.
Matthew Russell Lee at Inner City Press reported from the courtroom in New York Metropolis this week.
The Gateway Pundit can now report that we have now seen courtroom paperwork that query the veracity of E. Jean Carroll’s statements.
In accordance with courtroom paperwork seen by The Gateway Pundit, Miss Carroll admitted throughout questioning that she could have purchased it in 1995 as a result of Donna Karan didn’t make the costume in 1994 as she believed. She solely got here to this realization after New York Journal corrected her!
Earlier than the journal revealed the article, they helped E. Jean Carroll work out that the costume was not made in 1994 as she initially said.
Primarily based on what she stated as she was sitting for the deposition, E. Jean Carroll has no recollection of when the alleged assault occurred. All she will say at this time is that it occurred someday after 1995.
It’s so imprecise and nonspecific that her story in the end lacks credibility. Her lack of understanding of this vital piece of details about her Donna Karan costume makes this case completely ridiculous.
Finally, this case isn’t about E. Jean Carroll versus Donald Trump – It’s about E. Jean Carroll versus E. Jean Carroll. She doesn’t have any information nailed down on this case, and she or he by no means did.
President Trump responded to this new revelation, “E. Jean Carroll was pressured to vary her story on the “Monica Lewinsky-type” costume. She initially claimed that the “occasion” occurred in 1994, and that she wore the Donna Karan costume on that day. The issue is that New York Instances Truth Checkers discovered the costume wasn’t even made by Donna Karan till lengthy after 1994. The reality is that she doesn’t know the day, month, season, yr, or decade – as a result of it didn’t occur. Finish this Witch Hunt now!”
After which there’s this…
Right here’s what you might want to find out about E. Jean Carroll, that was beforehand reported right here on The Gateway Pundit. Most of those data have been deemed “inadmissible” by the decide per John LeFevre:
- She couldn’t recall the date, month, season, or yr the incident occurred
- She by no means instructed anybody about it, regardless of being publicly obsessed together with her personal sexuality
- The costume she claims to have been sporting didn’t exist on the time
- Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of occasions unattainable
- Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman
- Democrats created a legislation (The Grownup Survivors Act in 2022) to allow her lawsuit to proceed
- Her accusation is the precise plotline of an episode of Regulation & Order (one in all her “favourite exhibits”)
- Trump’s Apprentice was additionally one in all her favourite exhibits
- She has a historical past of falsely accusing males of rape, together with Les Moonves
- She instructed Anderson Cooper, “most individuals consider rape as being horny. Consider the fantasies.”
- She made a profession selling promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina
