
Billionaire Elon Musk has hailed Twitter as a bastion for freedom of expression ever since he acquired the social media website two years in the past. However over the course of 2024, X, as it’s now known as, has developed from what felt like a communal city sq. right into a polarised hub the place views and posts appear much more controversial.
Sure profiles which have shared deceptive takes on politics and the information, a few of which have been accused of triggering hate, have lately shot to prominence.
All of this issues as a result of X may not have as many customers as another main social media websites, but it surely does appear to have a major influence on political discussions. Not solely is it a spot the place sure high-profile politicians, governments and police forces share statements and views – however now its proprietor Mr Musk has instantly aligned himself with Donald Trump, a relationship that might redefine how the bosses of different social media giants cope with the subsequent US President.
So, what’s behind this new wave of change? Has there been a shift within the demographic of individuals utilizing X during the last 12 months – or might it’s the results of deliberate choices made by these in cost?
Rise of the Twitter ‘media’
Two months in the past, Inevitable West did not exist on X. Now the profile, which calls itself a “Defender of Western values and tradition”, has amassed 131,600 followers (a quantity that’s quickly rising). It’s racking up round 30 million views every day collectively amongst all of its posts, in line with its creator. Mr Musk has even responded to Inevitable West’s posts on X.
Their current posts, which frequently function information alert-style captions, embrace a faked video exhibiting Trump telling the British Prime Minister he’s going to “invade your nation and make Britain Nice Once more”.
There have additionally been a number of posts in assist of far-right activist Tommy Robinson, in addition to some debunked claims concerning the farmer’s protests within the UK and a knife assault in Southport, wherein three kids have been killed throughout a Taylor Swift-themed dance workshop.

Inevitable West denies accusations of pushing disinformation and inciting abuse or violence. “The aim of my X account is to be the voice for the silent majority of the Western world,” its creator informed me. They refused to share their id with me after we corresponded, however declare to be “Gen Z” and “not Russian”.
“Uncensored data and opinions will inevitably lead [to] the US and whole West and Europe transferring additional proper, [which is] confirmed by Donald Trump getting elected and surges in Europe’s far proper,” they argued. “Globally, it could imply corrupt politicians and leaders would get discovered.”
They seem to see the rise of their account because the “dying” of what they’d name the “MSM” or Mainstream Media. That is maybe no shock provided that, following the US Election, Mr Musk himself informed X customers: “You’re the Media Now”.
From blue ticks to likes: Modifications at X
When Mr Musk first acquired Twitter, he emphasised the necessity to home all political views and push again in opposition to censorship by social media firms and governments.
Modifications – together with mass layoffs and alterations to moderation insurance policies on points like political misinformation – began instantly.
There have additionally been varied alterations to the character of feeds together with the creation of two separate sections: “Following”, which options accounts you comply with, and “For You”, which is algorithmically curated, as on TikTok.

Over the course of 2024, nonetheless, there have been one other wave of alterations that seem to have reworked it additional. The block operate has been modified, that means that in the event you block an account you will not be shielded from that profile viewing what you submit. Likes, in the meantime, have been made non-public.
The location nonetheless options crowd-sourced group notes used to factcheck or rebuff what posts say – and customers are in a position to pay for blue ticks, which have been beforehand given freed from cost as an indication authenticating that the individual was who they mentioned they have been.
Now, although, it’s essential to pay to subscribe to X Premium to obtain a checkmark. (There are three tiers of subscription – within the UK, the Premium Tier presently prices round £10 a month).
Premium profiles are entitled to extra privileges and prominence – and might generate income from the engagement they get from different checkmarked profiles. From October, X modified its guidelines in order that as an alternative of basing income for particular person accounts round advertisements, it now takes under consideration likes, shares and feedback from different Premium accounts.

In fact different social media websites permit customers to generate income from posts and allow them to share sponsored content material – this isn’t unusual – however most main websites have guidelines that permit them to de-monetise or droop profiles that submit misinformation.
X doesn’t have guidelines to de-monetise accounts over these sorts of posts, though it does permit customers so as to add group notes to deceptive or false tweets. And it doesn’t permit “deceptive media” like manipulated or artificial movies that “might lead to widespread confusion on public points, influence public security or trigger severe hurt”.
In line with Inevitable West, X can now turn out to be a job. They informed me after they have been posting round seven instances a day they may accrue a minimal of “$2,500 a month”.
They are saying they know of one other account making “$25,000” every month – that account allegedly has 500,000 followers and posts “roughly 30” instances a day.
Has the algorithm modified?
Change can typically come about when a web site alters the algorithms (or suggestion techniques) ultimately, for instance to be able to enhance and profit sure posts. What’s unclear is whether or not or not which may be the case right here?
Actually, I’ve noticed a distinction within the number of posts really helpful on the “For You” feed in contrast with {that a} 12 months in the past.
That is one thing I analysed by an “Undercover Voter undertaking”, wherein I created and ran social media accounts belonging to greater than 20 fictional characters, primarily based within the US and UK, which replicate views from throughout the political spectrum.
These characters have profiles on the primary websites together with X, permitting me to interrogate what totally different accounts have been really helpful on social media. The accounts are non-public and don’t message actual folks or have mates.

Whatever the totally different political opinions their accounts specific, I noticed that within the final six months of this 12 months their feeds have turn out to be dominated by divisive posts, and have a tendency to function extra in assist of Trump or in opposition to politicians and folks internationally who are usually not seen to be aligned with the US president elect.
Nevertheless, all of this appears to be the consequence of the surroundings and the varied adjustments to the broader website, somewhat than solely a easy tweak to the algorithm.
Andrew Kaung, who was beforehand an analyst on consumer security at TikTok and has additionally labored at Meta, has spent years observing how these suggestion techniques may be up to date and altered. “What we have seen on X is not only about algorithms altering, additionally it is knowledgeable by the shortage of security mechanisms within the identify of free speech,” he says.

Nina Jankowicz is former Govt Director on the Disinformation Governance Board of america, which was arrange in 2022 to advise the Division of Homeland Safety on points together with Russian disinformation and later disbanded after public backlash over issues together with round freedom of expression and transparency. She argues that X’s algorithms now “privilege divisive and deceptive rhetoric” and means that customers who submit much less controversial content material have discovered a discount within the views.
“The consequence is that the platform that touts itself as a public sq. is an awfully synthetic surroundings, a real black mirror of essentially the most worrying elements of human nature.”
The unintended influencers
I messaged dozens of different giant accounts, who describe the rising affect they’re in a position to have on the positioning, usually unexpectedly.
“I by no means actually supposed to turn out to be an influencer,” admits one profile known as Andi, who says he is primarily based in New York. “However I determine since I’ve this platform I ought to attempt to use it to advance my very own causes.”
He describes how he shared a meme of squirrel – after studying a couple of squirrel that was euthanised over issues it might have rabies – which now has 45 million views. Andi compares his attain to that of widespread podcaster Joe Rogan, who has 14.5 million followers on X.
“However I’m no Joe Rogan, so it is actually particular that one thing I submit can get nearly as a lot viewership.”
Andi and different X accounts I’ve corresponded with imagine that the adjustments to X are an excellent factor, as they now have a attain they may have by no means anticipated.
Allegations of moderation bias
Earlier this month, an assault at a German market, which killed 5 folks and injured greater than 200, was extensively debated on X. A lot of the dialogue centred across the suspect, a German resident initially from Saudi Arabia. German prosecutors have mentioned the investigation is ongoing, however instructed one potential motive for the assault “might have been disgruntlement with the best way Saudi Arabian refugees are handled in Germany”.
Inevitable West was amongst those that commented: “Raid the mosques. Ban the Quran. Perform mass deportations. Our endurance has formally expired.”
The account has been accused of inflaming hate with posts about points together with immigration and faith. Different customers mentioned this might incite violence. However the profile responded by saying that they have been “really inciting security”.

When questioned on this, Inevitable West informed me that they’d say the identical about different religions. Individually, additionally they mentioned they’d by no means delete their very own posts – even after they change into unfaithful.
In the meantime, their content material is being seen by feeds around the globe.
Allegations of bias sparsely strategies have lengthy been levelled at Twitter, each earlier than and since Mr Musk acquired the corporate, alongside questions on whether or not the positioning beforehand restricted freedom of expression.
I spoke to Twitter insiders about this for a Panorama investigation which aired in 2023, they usually informed me that, of their view, the corporate was going to wrestle to guard customers from trolling, state-coordinated disinformation and youngster sexual exploitation, placing this all the way down to, amongst different issues, mass layoffs.
On the time, X didn’t reply to the factors raised. Afterwards, Mr Musk tweeted a BBC article concerning the Panorama episode with the caption: “Sorry for turning Twitter from nurturing paradise into a spot that has… trolls”. He additionally declared, “trolls are kinda enjoyable”.
Individually, Mr Musk had mentioned he had “no alternative” however to cut back the corporate’s workforce due to monetary losses.
Lisa Jennings Younger, former head of content material design at X who labored there till 2022, says: “I really feel like we’re all dwelling by an unlimited social experiment [on humanity].”
It would not have a specified objective, she says. As an alternative, in her view, it’s “not a managed social science experiment [but one] we’re all part of”. Nobody actually is aware of what the ultimate end result might be, she argues.

Some X customers inform me that they’ve lately determined emigrate to different social media platforms, together with Bluesky, which began in 2019 as an experimental “de-centralised” social media website created by former Twitter boss Jack Dorsey. It now has greater than 20 million customers.
It’s tough to find out precisely what number of actual customers have chosen to depart X – or certainly if it has grown.
Elon Musk and X didn’t reply to the factors raised on this article, nor to requests for an interview.

X says that its precedence is to guard and defend the consumer’s voice and it has pointers about hate, which say that customers “might not goal others with abuse or harassment or encourage different folks to take action”.
An X spokesperson beforehand informed the BBC: “X has in place a variety of insurance policies and options to guard the dialog surrounding elections. We’ll label content material that violates our artificial and manipulated media coverage, and take away accounts engaged in platform manipulation or different severe violations of our guidelines.”
The location additionally informed the European Fee in November: “[X] strives to be the city sq. of the web by selling and defending freedom of expression.”
Social media meets political affect
Because the 2024 US presidential election, X has cemented its place as the house of political updates concerning the new Trump administration.
Mr Musk endorsed Trump as a candidate way back to July. He has now been supplied a authorities place, main a brand new advisory workforce known as the Division of Authorities Effectivity (Doge).
Sam Freeman, a former Meta worker who now works as an skilled in Belief and Security for an organization known as Cinder, believes that this may have a broader impact on different social media bosses too. He predicts them “needing to have a extra private relationship with the incoming administration”, significantly in the event that they really feel growing stress over regulation and on-line security.
Mark Zuckerberg, who based Fb (now Meta) and has since acquired Instagram, lately had dinner with Trump at his residence in Mar-a-Lago.

The President-elect had taken purpose at Mr Zuckerberg on beforehand events, accusing his web site and others of bias. “Fb, Google and Twitter, to not point out the Corrupt Media, are sooo on the facet of the Radical Left Democrats,” Trump as soon as wrote.
May the dinner point out a softening of relations? Actually it means that Mr Zuckerberg considers that being at the least considerably in shut proximity to Trump might be in his curiosity.
So, it appears, does TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, who was additionally reported to have met Trump at Mar-a-Lago because the social media firm fights plans by US authorities to ban the app.
The US authorities claims TikTok’s dad or mum firm ByteDance has hyperlinks to the Chinese language state. Each TikTok and ByteDance deny this. The Supreme Court docket is because of hear authorized arguments from TikTok in January.

Within the the UK, the On-line Security Act will quickly be enforced, underneath which firms should make commitments to the regulator Ofcom about how they are going to deal with unlawful content material and posts which are dangerous to kids. In Australia, politicians have gone a step additional and authorised plans to ban kids underneath 16 from utilizing social media.
In the end although – given what number of social media giants are primarily based within the US – it’s the strategy of the American authorities and president that might have the best influence.
“I see Trump’s emotions in direction of a platform dictating the best way his administration views them,” argues Mr Freeman.
The query that is still is what Trump’s views on this actually are – and whether or not he’ll demand accountability otherwise from these websites sooner or later, or by no means.
The ramifications, whichever method it goes, will little doubt be far-reaching.
High image credit score: Reuters and Getty Photos
BBC InDepth is the brand new residence on the web site and app for the perfect evaluation and experience from our high journalists. Beneath a particular new model, we’ll carry you recent views that problem assumptions, and deep reporting on the most important points that will help you make sense of a posh world. And we’ll be showcasing thought-provoking content material from throughout BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. We’re beginning small however pondering large, and we need to know what you suppose – you may ship us your suggestions by clicking on the button under.