Keep knowledgeable with free updates
Merely signal as much as the EU economic system myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
The author is co-chief government of the Itinera Institute, a Brussels-based think-tank, and the writer of ‘Superpower Europe: The European Union’s Silent Revolution’
“Everyone knows what we’ve got to do, however we don’t know find out how to get re-elected as soon as we’ve got executed it.” So stated Jean-Claude Juncker again in 2007 when he was president of the European Fee. Quick ahead to 2025, Europe’s new “Juncker curse” is that its politicians know what they must do however don’t know find out how to pay for it. Name it, as regards to the present fee president, “Von der Leyen’s curse”.
No fewer than three main studies revealed final yr — by Enrico Letta, Mario Draghi and Sauli Niinistö — urge European leaders to push forward with deepening market integration, boosting innovation and funding in crucial sectors and applied sciences, and with constructing self-reliance to face disaster and battle.
This quest for prosperity, energy and safety comes with an unprecedented price ticket. Draghi alone advocates an extra €800bn in annual spending. The place is the EU supposed to seek out this sort of cash and the way can spending on such a scale be mobilised to assist widespread priorities fairly than slender nationwide preferences?
Probably the most elegant answer could be large public-private partnership schemes. In a really perfect situation the EU, along with the European Funding Financial institution, would make institutional buyers and enterprise capitalists affords they can not refuse: the power to say a stake within the financial and technological way forward for the continent with assured authorities spending and/or protected market potential as a income mannequin. However co-ordinating this from Brussels throughout 27 member states could be a Herculean activity. Simply contemplate how the a lot less complicated widespread European defence bond has didn’t materialise, regardless of the horrors in Ukraine.
Then there are taxes. An EU that raises import tariffs, emission levies and different taxes to make the taking part in area truthful and sustainable within the European market can doubtlessly make investments tens of billions yearly. Nevertheless, taxes could also be counterproductive in the event that they harm the very European business we search to maintain and defend. They usually could also be downright harmful in the event that they find yourself hurting firms from international locations with which Europe doesn’t desire a commerce warfare.
What’s left are debt mechanisms. However the stability of Europe’s unfinished financial union imposes preventive budgetary self-discipline on member states. Deficits for strategic investments stay doable, however require country-by-country negotiations with the fee. Mutualised European debt invested straight from Brussels is a political Rubicon member states nonetheless must cross.
The EU not solely has too few assets, it additionally doesn’t know find out how to spend what it does have rapidly and effectively. Processes are gradual, bureaucratic and customarily not very clear for collaborating firms or international locations. The bloc should compete with China, Russia and the US in what has turn out to be a worldwide arms race of state capitalism and mercantilism. However Brussels has neither the political nor monetary heft to compete with Beijing, Moscow or Washington.
If the EU actually desires to reside as much as its ambitions, the prevailing platform for essential tasks of widespread European curiosity is usually a stepping stone, offered it may well scale up and velocity up. Extra probably is an ecosystem of funding initiatives and automobiles outdoors formal EU programmes, via coalitions of buyers and/or member states.
First-mover benefit will play a job as international locations with a stake in strategic sectors can declare future market share by contributing to collective EU ambitions. Poland, as an illustration, has been main the pack in mobilising public spending for defence and safety capabilities alongside Europe’s jap border and within the Baltic.
This, then, is the best way to carry Von der Leyen’s curse. Enable coalitions of states to mix in respective self-interest and in strategic partnership with their industries, taking state help to a co-ordinated multinational degree.
Neglect the outdated separation of the European market and home state help — the latter serves the mixing of the previous for geopolitical functions. Neglect the decision-making machineries that usually stymie EU motion and as a substitute create room for advert hoc preparations throughout the bloc’s general technique. And neglect even the excellence between member states and third international locations — what issues is the best geopolitical coalition in assist of EU insurance policies, and that features a nation such because the UK in issues of safety and defence. Lifting Von der Leyen’s curse, it seems, may even carry the Brexit curse as properly.
