The Ninth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals on Thursday upheld California’s ban on large-capacity magazines.
The en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit Courtroom (a choice from the courtroom’s complete slate of judges) sided with California’s radical Marxist Lawyer Common Rob Bonta.
In 2023, a federal judge struck down California’s ban on high-capacity gun magazines.
US District Decide Roger Benitez, a George W. Bush appointee, in his ruling stated, “there isn’t a American custom of limiting ammunition capability.” The choose stated removable magazines “solved an issue with historic firearms: working out of ammunition and having to slowly reload a gun.”
“There have been, and there might be, instances the place many greater than 10 rounds are wanted to cease attackers,” Benitez wrote, in accordance with CBS News. “But, below this statute, the State says ‘too dangerous.’”
The choose is totally right.
Nonetheless, California’s radical Lawyer Common Rob Bonta instantly filed an attraction.
In October 2023, the Ninth Circuit granted California’s request for a keep of the district courtroom choose’s choice.
Final 12 months the Ninth Circuit took up one other problem to the state’s ban on high-capacity magazines.
On Thursday, in a 7-4 choice, the courtroom’s complete slate of judges upheld the ban on large-capacity magazines.
Decide Lawrence VanDyke, a Trump appointee who grew up in Bozeman, Montana, angered a lefty choose on the courtroom after he launched a extremely uncommon video dissent demonstrating him dealing with a number of totally different firearms.
Decide Marsha Berzon, a Clinton appointee, blasted Decide VanDyke for releasing the video dissent.
“Decide Berzon identified two issues with Decide VanDyke’s reliance on the video: (1) The video shouldn’t be a part of his written dissent and it consists of information outdoors the document. (2) Decide VanDyke has in essence appointed himself as an professional witness on this case, offering a factual presentation with the specific goal of convincing the readers of his view of the information with out complying with any of the procedural safeguards that normally apply to consultants and their testimony, whereas concurrently serving on the panel deciding the case,” the judges wrote in a pointy rebuke.
WATCH:
BREAKING: ninth Circuit en banc courtroom upholds California’s ban on massive gun magazines, 7-4. Decide Van Dyke’s extremely uncommon video dissent, exhibiting him dealing with handguns, sparks sharp response from Decide Berzon. Doc: https://t.co/l0ZyLYFgsk Video: https://t.co/ZfLY6tOKZv
— Josh Gerstein (@joshgerstein) March 20, 2025
