It’s not a secret that The Gateway Pundit, the fifth-largest conservative news website in America as we speak, has one of the vital dishonest and vile entries on Wikipedia.
This works out properly for the globalist left in the truth that we don’t personal our title on Wikipedia – the far-left editors do, we can’t remark or clarify any entry underneath our title, we can’t edit our entry to incorporate our award-winning journalism, we can’t rebut any of their lies about us.
It’s an excellent device for the left and it has price conservatives, together with this web site, hundreds of thousands of {dollars} in potential visitors and earnings.
The Gateway Pundit is just not the one conservative web site that Wikipedia smears and lies about.
In December 2019, T. D. Adler at Breitbart News reported that Wikipedia blacklists now included The Epoch Instances and The Gateway Pundit for our truthful reporting on Russiagate.
Wikipedia highlighted The Gateway Pundit’s reporting that was true and factual and used it towards us as an excuse to censor our web site.
In keeping with Adler,
China critics the Epoch Instances and conservative outlet the Gateway Pundit have been banned from use as dependable sources on Wikipedia within the newest circumstances of stories shops that assist President Trump being banned from the net encyclopedia. The Epoch Instances ban proposal cited NBC’s hit piece on the positioning over its protection of improprieties within the Russia investigation, generally referred to as Spygate, which prompted smear efforts towards the outlet on Wikipedia. Gateway Pundit was proposed for a ban shortly after Epoch Instances.
The Epoch Instances Wikipedia ban proposal was apparently prompted by certainly one of its articles being cited on the Wikipedia web page for Joseph Mifsud, a key controversial determine within the origins of the discredited Russia investigation. Gateway Pundit’s ban was in response to the outlet being cited for previous media silence over Ukrainian interference within the 2016 election.
Over the previous 12 months, Wikipedia editors have been on a banning spree concentrating on conservative information sources. Having beforehand banned the Day by day Mail as a supply, the next 12 months marked the start of an acceleration of the method. Since then, editors have imposed related bans on fifteen different websites except for Epoch Instances and Gateway Pundit. Whereas some data-focused websites and state-owned shops in Venezuela and Iran have additionally been banned, the majority of the websites banned have been conservative-leaning information shops. Breitbart Information was blacklisted as a “dependable supply” on Wikipedia in 2018…
…Gateway Pundit’s ban got here from a proposal quickly after the proposed ban for Epoch Instances. The ban proposal got here in response to editor “BullRangifer” removing a 2017 piece criticizing media silence on Ukraine colluding with Democrats to affect the 2016 election. The article was originally added to border Gateway Pundit as “fueling conspiracy theories” associated to the impeachment inquiry over Trump’s name with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In actual fact, the piece appropriately famous Politico’s coverage of DNC contractor Alexandra Chalupa soliciting Ukrainian interference and then-Democratic minority chief of the Home Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff expressing concerns concerning the reported interference.
Criticism of Gateway Pundit was harsher in the course of the ban discussion, although nonetheless predominantly from left-wing editors. Some regarded the outlet as unreliable, however argued towards a full sourcing ban as they believed some authentic makes use of might exist. Along with Simonm223, who additionally voted for the ban, editors advocating a ban included “Snooganssnoogans” and “Volunteer Marek” who every have a historical past of smearing the outlet on Wikipedia.
These Wikipedia assaults towards The Gateway Pundit have gone on for years.
Wikipedia even attacked The Gateway Pundit on our COVID Protection that we now know was probably the most correct within the nation. The Trump administration even created a website to point out the reality concerning the Chinese language laboratory virus and the federal government web site agrees with all of our earlier reporting on the topic. Wikipedia was reporting inaccurate info on topic for years and attacking and smearing those that reported the reality.
It now seems that each one of Wikipedia’s lies and biased assaults have lastly caught up with them.
On Thursday, US Lawyer for the District of Columbia Ed Martin wrote to the Wikimedia Basis, which sponsors Wikipedia, demanding solutions to its years of biased, politicized, and dishonest concentrating on of conservative entries on the platform.
Lawyer Martin requested that the Wikimedia Basis flip over paperwork relating to its tax-exempt standing. The inspiration has till Could 15, 2025, to show over the paperwork.
Ed Martin goes after Wikipedia! This corrupt establishment has labored towards America and conservative content material producers for method too lengthy.
Martin is taking up this corrupt leftist propaganda machine. Go Ed!
BOOM. WIKIPEDIA JUST GOT SLAPPED WITH A FEDERAL WAKE-UP CALL.
The Division of Justice simply dropped the hammer — the U.S. Lawyer for D.C. is formally accusing the Wikimedia Basis of violating its 501(c)(3) standing by letting propagandists flood the platform with… pic.twitter.com/UMehMzbY7r
— Jews Struggle Again (@JewsFightBack) April 25, 2025
Ed Martin letter to Wikimedia Basis- web page 1
Ed Martin letter to Wikimedia Basis – web page 2
Ed Martin letter to Wikimedia Basis – web page 3
Ed Martin letter to Wikimedia Basis- web page 4
