Know thy enemy and know your self, and you’ll by no means lose a battle … or one thing like that.
Nevertheless the adage from famed Chinese language navy strategist Solar Tzu truly goes, it usually rings true in each battle and real-life — so it’s truly price observing the entire ways in which failed presidential candidate Kamala Harris got here up brief in opposition to President-elect Donald Trump.
And, if this author goes to be brutally trustworthy, even when there aren’t any classes to be gleaned from Harris’ boneheaded marketing campaign methods, it’s actually price amusing — not hers — or two.
So with out additional ado, right here’s a breakdown of simply a few of the methods Harris and her group fumbled away a golden alternative to upend Trump, in no specific order.
(Partisan politics apart, an incumbent vice chairman with a truncated election cycle was going in opposition to a deeply polarizing politician — standard knowledge would recommend the momentum ought to’ve firmly been Harris’.)
The entire Cheney debacle: In case you wanted any shred of proof that Harris is completely and completely disconnected from her personal base, look no additional than the best way she paraded around Liz Cheney, whereas additionally crowing about an endorsement from Dick Cheney.
It takes all of a fast perusal by means of a current historical past ebook to see why the warmongering Cheney’s are as deeply unpopular on each sides of the political aisle as they’re.
If Harris actually thought embracing the Cheney’s was a technique to attain throughout the aisle and unite, she was type of proper.
Younger males: To her minimal credit score, not less than Harris realized simply how poorly she was polling with younger American males.
She simply went about addressing that deficiency with almost each dangerous thought within the ebook.
Seems that the good political minds on Harris’ marketing campaign thought that berating and shaming younger males was a profitable technique, which fits a protracted technique to clarify the ultimate distinction in electoral faculty votes.
(And no, Kamala Harris wasn’t doing particularly good with ladies, either.)
The Adolf Hitler conundrum: Of their fervor to label Trump and his supporters the worst of the worst, Harris and her marketing campaign saved discovering themselves evaluating conservatives to the Third Reich.
And whereas which may’ve been an efficient instrument in, say, the 1944 presidential election, in 2024, the Democrats have formally sapped “Nazi” of any precise heft, significance or which means, because of rampant overuse.
It’s a dropping technique that’s clearly offering diminishing returns for the left, but they hold leaning on it like a crutch as a result of they honestly don’t have anything else.
The racism conundrum: Much like the above challenge, Harris and her group in all probability thought they bought a particular present when Trump employed a roast comic for a New York rally only a week earlier than the election. That comic promptly in contrast Puerto Rico to a floating isle of rubbish, sparking all types of allegations about racism.
And had Democrats and the left not utterly and completely sapped “racism” of all which means, they might very effectively have been capable of flip that incident into some real momentum.
As a substitute, Election Tuesday occurred.
Being two-faced: In case your candidate (on this case Harris) already has a problem with coming throughout as inauthentic and compelled, possibly don’t put out wildly two-faced messaging, like her marketing campaign had been doing whereas attempting to appease each Jewish and Arab American voters who might have some robust emotions in regards to the ongoing battle between Israel and Hamas.
A lot to the chagrin of Democrats, there doesn’t look like something near a simple reply for this — each Kamala’s inauthentic perspective and the celebration’s messaging relating to Israel.
Final, however actually not least: It merely can’t be confused sufficient {that a} main U.S. political celebration nominated a presidential candidate who didn’t garner a single main vote.
How can anybody take Democrats significantly after the best way they flagrantly disregarded, you realize, democracy within the lead-up to this election. It places an asterisk by all the pieces Harris did, which isn’t one thing on-the-fence voters are prone to overlook.
Kamala Harris was an put in puppet. Interval.
She’s a failed, put in puppet, however an put in puppet nonetheless, and that’s one thing Democrats wanted to personal — not sweep beneath the rug.
Harris undoubtedly made quite a few different blunders on her truncated marketing campaign path (facet observe, please don’t let the institution media gaslight you into pondering her shortened marketing campaign was an obstacle. There’s an enormous cause Harris has fizzled on the massive stage anytime potential voters get to know her), however these are only a few that stood out now that the mud has settled.
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.
