There may be an inherent pressure within the dissemination of analysis. On one hand, science thrives on openness and communication. On the opposite, guaranteeing high-quality scientific work requires peer opinions which can be typically prolonged and closed. In 1991, physicist Paul Ginsparg created the arXiv repository to alleviate a few of that pressure. The concept is that researchers have a spot to add their preprint manuscripts earlier than they’re printed in a journal. The preprints are free to all however haven’t undergone peer review (there may be some screening).
Nevertheless, arXiv doesn’t facilitate open, two-way dialogue. Now, two Stanford college students have developed an extension of arXiv that creates a centralized public sq., of kinds, for researchers to debate preprints. IEEE Spectrum spoke with one of many two, Rehaan Ahmad, concerning the challenge.
Rehaan Ahmad
Rehaan Ahmad is the cofounder of alphaXiv, which he started as an undergraduate challenge whereas at Stanford University, alongside fellow pupil Raj Palleti.
How does alphaXiv work?
Rehaan Ahmad: You possibly can change the “arXiv” within the URL to “alphaXiv,” and it opens up the paper and there’s feedback and dialogue. You possibly can spotlight sections and go away in-line feedback. There’s additionally a extra normal dwelling web page the place you’ll be able to see what papers different individuals are studying via the positioning. It finally ends up being a pleasant method to filter for what papers are attention-grabbing and what aren’t.
What motivated you to create the positioning?
Ahmad: My cocreator Raj Palleti and I had been undergrads at Stanford doing analysis in robotics and reinforcement learning. We figured lots of people would have questions on papers, like us. So I put collectively somewhat mock-up two or three years in the past. It was simply sitting on my pc for some time. After which a 12 months afterward I confirmed it to Raj, and he stated we have to make this a public website. We considered it as a model of Stack Overflow for papers.
How troublesome was it to construct?
Ahmad: Surprisingly troublesome! Our background is in analysis, and one of many tougher classes for this challenge is that writing analysis code versus precise code that works are two various things. For analysis code, you write one thing as soon as, you place it on GitHub, nobody will use it—and in the event that they do, it’s their drawback to determine. However right here, the positioning has been round for a 12 months and a half, and solely lately have a whole lot of the bugs been form of hashed out. The challenge began out on a single AWS server, and anytime somebody would publish about it, it could go viral, and the server would go down.
How do you hope alphaXiv might be used?
Ahmad: I see alphaXiv as simply connecting the world of analysis in a manner that’s extra productive than Twitter [now X]. Folks discover errors in papers right here; individuals will learn their opinions. I’ve been seeing extra productive discussions with the authors.
Your advisors embrace Udacity cofounder Sebastian Thrun and Meta’s chief AI scientist, Yann LeCun. How have your advisors contributed?
Ahmad: After the primary few months of working alphaXiv, we circulated quite a bit inside the computer-science neighborhood. However after discussing the platform with [University of Maryland physics professor] Victor Galitski, we realized having his voice and opinion to information choices that had been related to the physics neighborhood can be extremely necessary. These inquisitive about computer-science papers are normally extra within the trending/likes/filtering facet of our website, whereas these inquisitive about physics are normally extra discussion-oriented.
This text seems within the April 2025 problem as “5 Questions for Rehaan Ahmad.”
From Your Web site Articles
Associated Articles Across the Net
