To the editor: The letter you printed concerning the massive variety of detrimental articles about former President Trump and only a few detrimental articles about Vice President Kamala Harris is lifeless on. You ought to be printing comparable articles about her.
I counsel that you simply present protection for her federal trial over her conduct on Jan. 6, 2021, and her efforts to steal the presidency; her New York civil trial for defamation and sexual abuse; her different New York trial for fraud; her federal Florida trial for allegedly stealing paperwork and refusing to return them; and her Georgia election interference trial.
You also needs to have protection for each time that she has talked about utilizing the U.S. army in opposition to the American folks, each need she has ever uttered about eager to be a dictator, and each tariff she has ever championed that might act like a tax on the American folks.
Emery Galambos, Los Angeles
..
To the editor: To these readers who accuse the L.A. Instances of unfairness in its protection of the 2 presidential candidates, I supply the next state of affairs for consideration.
If the Democratic candidate routinely spouted false and harmful prattle whereas the Republican candidate constantly supplied fact-based and smart options for a greater America, what could be the possible method for the L.A. Instances to take?
I’ve little doubt that this newspaper’s journalistic integrity and dedication to truthful reporting would dictate in depth and aggressive protection.
The L.A. Instances is a Democratic Occasion apparatchik? Hardly.
Frederick Miller, Los Angeles
