Elon Musk delivered remarks at a city corridor on Sunday in Pennsylvania, the place he known as out the rigging of our elections and known as for elections with “paper ballots in individual with ID.”
“I’d be comfortable if it was simply that, , residents voted. , I name {that a} win, he advised the group. “If we are able to simply guarantee that solely authorized residents can vote, which is the way it’s imagined to be, I’d say that’d be fairly a victory in comparison with what we now have proper now.”
A large crowd turned out to see Elon Musk right this moment. Right here’s a take a look at the road through Matthew Smith on X:
Elon Musk has been on the marketing campaign path for Donald Trump over the previous week. As The Gateway Pundit reported, Musk was within the swing state for a Wednesday city corridor occasion and advised the group, “This election, I believe, goes to determine the destiny of America, and together with the destiny of America, the destiny of Western civilization.”
That is why the Democrats are attempting to cease him. The Gateway Pundit reported on Sunday that Musk is now coming beneath hearth from Democrats like Pennsylvania’s Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro, who mentioned regulation enforcement ought to ‘have a look’ on the billionaire entrepreneur’s each day $1 million giveaway to signers of his petition in assist of constitutional rights.
That is how a lot the Democrats hate our Structure. They wish to criminalize petitioning in assist of our rights as Individuals.
The occasion venue for tonight’s occasion was fully crammed hours earlier than Elon took the stage:
Through the occasion, Elon spoke about digital voting machines, sharing that in his expertise computer systems are “straightforward” to hack and that “the very last thing we wish to do is have digital voting machines.”
Watch beneath:
Musk: Effectively, I imply, frankly, I might be comfortable if it was simply that, , residents voted. , I name {that a} win. If we are able to simply guarantee that solely authorized residents can vote, which is the way it’s imagined to be, I might say that’d be fairly a victory in comparison with what we now have proper now. So simply—and I believe having extra transparency on elections, most transparency on elections, and as I’ve mentioned earlier than, I believe we should always not enable voting machines of any sort. So, , I have been programming computer systems since I used to be 9 years previous. And, , I understand how straightforward it’s to, , get a line of software program incorrect or hack a pc. And so, I believe the very last thing we wish to do is have digital voting machines. We wish paper ballots in individual with ID.
And truly kind of, by way of an actual AI hazard that hopefully isn’t there this yr, however will definitely be a hazard sooner or later, is that superior AI can be tremendous good at hacking computer systems. And so, when you have voting machines which can be linked to the web, and you have got tremendous superior AI that may doubtlessly have an effect on these machines, I believe that is very harmful. So what I am saying is that I am usually somebody who favors know-how. I am tremendous; , I’m a twenty first century know-how boy, proper right here. And I am saying no, no machines for voting.
