Mark Zuckerberg, the so-called champion of innovation and democracy, has turned Fb and Meta right into a dystopian nightmare, silencing voices he deems unworthy and manipulating the circulation of knowledge.
The billionaire’s obsession with censorship has remodeled what was as soon as a platform without spending a dime expression right into a digital gulag the place conservative viewpoints are systematically suppressed.
Because the 2020 election, his platform has been on the forefront of stifling conservative voices, all whereas hiding behind the guise of “fact-checking” and “misinformation management.”
Let’s not neglect his controversial donations of a whole bunch of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} to election efforts throughout the 2020 race—funds that have been used to fortify liberal strongholds beneath the pretext of supporting “election infrastructure.”
The so-called “Zuckerbucks” scandal despatched shockwaves via conservative circles, with many rightly accusing Zuckerberg of meddling within the election course of to sway the end result in favor of the Democrat Get together.
The hundreds of thousands he funneled into native elections have been, in actuality, an try and skew the vote by boosting turnout in Democratic districts.
Learn extra about Zuckerbucks:
The 2021 revelation that the Biden regime pressured Meta to take away content material associated to COVID-19 uncovered simply how deep his collusion with left-wing elites runs.
Quite than upholding free speech, Zuckerberg bent the knee, eagerly censoring any narrative that didn’t align with the Biden regime’s agenda.
His willingness to function the Biden regime’s private propaganda machine additional confirms that Meta shouldn’t be a impartial platform—it’s an extension of the left’s totalitarian playbook.
Final month, Zuckerberg openly admitted that Meta, the mum or dad firm of Fb, was subjected to relentless strain by the Biden regime to censor content material associated to COVID-19, even when the content material was satirical or humorous, and the notorious Hunter Biden laptop computer.
The Meta CEO allegedly expressed deep ‘remorse’ for not being extra vocal in resisting the federal government’s calls for, stating that “authorities strain was flawed,” and he now acknowledges that his firm ought to have been extra outspoken in regards to the administration’s overreach.
Zuckerberg’s current so-called “regrets” are nothing greater than political theater.
Zuckerberg’s descent into authoritarianism isn’t new. The Gateway Pundit’s Jim Hoft, yours actually, spoke in entrance of Congress back in 2018.
TGP mentioned and introduced proof of the widespread censorship and elimination of conservative content material on Fb.
Transcript of my testimony:
Over the previous 19 months, Gateway Pundit noticed a decline in our Fb site visitors from 24% of whole web site site visitors in January 2017 to 2% of whole web site site visitors in June 2018.
That is an 88% lower in Fb site visitors.
Not too long ago we analyzed site visitors numbers for a few of the prime conservative publishers within the U.S. What we discovered was merely stunning. Simply as Gateway Pundit had been eradicated by Fb from being seen by its readers, Fb eradicated 93% [2]of mixed referral site visitors to those web sites from January 2017 to Might 2018.
The positioning Western Journal and different conservative web sites beneath their umbrella had greater than a billion web page views in 2016. Since then the group misplaced 75% of its Fb site visitors. Likewise, Klicked Media, host of over 60 conservative web sites, misplaced 400 million web page views from Fb within the final six months when in comparison with the prior yr. The overall variety of pageviews misplaced[3] by simply these two conservative on-line publishers is greater than 1.5 billion pageviews from Fb in a single yr.
After the 2016 election, Fb started making algorithm modifications to make sure conservative information was now not an possibility for his or her customers. Two research launched in March of 2018 verify this. A research by The Define Group[4] discovered conservative publishers have been hit the toughest by current Fb algorithm modifications — and that The Gateway Pundit was hit the toughest.
The billionaire CEO of Meta has reportedly employed a Republican strategist in a bid to restore his tattered relationship with conservative media, in line with the New York Occasions.
However don’t be fooled by this sudden shift —that is nothing greater than a determined try and rebrand himself after years of totalitarian censorship that has silenced conservative voices on Fb and Instagram.
New York Times reported:
As an alternative of publicly partaking with Washington, Mr. Zuckerberg is repairing relationships with politicians behind the scenes. After the “Zuckerbucks” criticism, Mr. Zuckerberg employed Brian Baker, a distinguished Republican strategist, to enhance his positioning with right-wing media and Republican officers. Within the lead-up to November’s election, Mr. Baker has emphasised to Mr. Trump and his prime aides that Mr. Zuckerberg has no plans to make related donations, an individual aware of the discussions stated.
Mr. Zuckerberg has but to forge a relationship with Vice President Kamala Harris. However over the summer time, Mr. Zuckerberg had his first conversations with Mr. Trump since he left workplace, in line with individuals aware of the conversations.
Through the Republican Nationwide Conference in Milwaukee, Mr. Trump thanked the billionaire in a cellphone name for publicly saying that he was “praying” for Mr. Trump after the current assassination try, in line with an individual briefed on the decision.
Only a few weeks later, they talked once more.
After Meta erroneously took down photographs of the assassination try that have been circulating throughout Meta, Mr. Zuckerberg known as the previous president straight and apologized for the error, in line with two individuals aware of the discuss. Representatives for Mr. Trump and Mr. Zuckerberg have provided differing accounts of what occurred on the decision.
“Personal discussions between President Trump and anybody else are simply that — non-public,” stated Steven Cheung, a Trump marketing campaign spokesman.
In keeping with NYT, Zuckerberg is now making an attempt to painting himself as extra like “libertarianism or classical liberalism.”
That is a determined ploy to salvage Meta’s picture amongst conservatives who’ve lengthy deserted his platform.
Meta’s monitor document speaks for itself: censorship, suppression, and manipulation of public discourse. Whether or not it’s silencing conservative voices or pandering to the progressive elite, Zuckerberg’s totalitarian management over data is a grave menace to the very material of free speech and democracy. We should not enable his slick rebranding to idiot us into complacency.
