The takeaway of any trustworthy viewer of Kamala Harris’ much-lambasted interview with CNN’s Dana Bash this previous week is that of somebody overwhelmed – burdened, one would possibly say – by the stresses of campaigning, and for that cause, wholly unsuited to the workplace that she seeks. Although the Left would beg to vary, one can nonetheless stage a criticism towards a so-called “particular person of shade” that isn’t primarily based on race or gender, however quite, stands alone as an goal evaluation of the candidate’s efficiency.
When it comes to conviction, Harris reduce the other of the picture of a assured chief. The truth that she wanted Tim Walz together with her in tow, who has been needled by the press as “Kamala’s consolation canine” – somebody who is meant to supply assurance for a candidate palpably in over her head, is hardly the look of a robust, unbiased lady. Quite than be the change candidate, the impression was a candidate ill-equipped in each doable approach to tackle the solemn and sober duties of the best political workplace within the land. Not a superb search for a president.
Kamala’s uncertainty started together with her non-responses, which invariably devolved into “phrase salads” of jumbled and confused ideas, decoupled from specifics on coverage or something resembling a novel or coherent line of reasoning. This was instantly on show when Bash pressed Harris on her pivot on a number of insurance policies, particularly fracking. In 2020, as a Democratic candidate for president, Harris ran on a platform of banning the observe unilaterally. Her change now could be clearly born of political expediency, plain and easy. Everybody is aware of this gambit: she is desperately attempting to pander to essential voters in Pennsylvania and different rustbelt states, whose economies so closely rely upon the oil and fuel industries. Solely a idiot would deny that incontestable truth. So too would a idiot imagine Kamala at her phrase, and assume she has come to a real change of coronary heart on that problem.
Fortunately, most individuals aren’t fools. This was evident by the downward traits in prediction markets and main pollsters, which had Kamala Harris driving the wave of a manufactured “honeymoon interval” narrative within the weeks after Joe Biden was pressured out of the race. The fallout of the CNN debacle was swift and unforgiving: Polymarkets, a betting platform, which had Kamala main Donald Trump earlier than the CNN interview, instantly reverted to having the forty fifth President forward as soon as once more.
After Kamala Harris’ disastrous interview efficiency, Polymarket, a prediction market platform, put Donald Trump within the lead over Kamala Harris.
Nate Silver, a left-leaning pollster who created FiveThirtyEight, also yielded a forecast model that gave Donald Trump a 5 level benefit over his opponent in taking the electoral faculty. These polls and prediction markets point out that People can detect a choke and bullshit artist once they see one, and Kamala Harris, whose acted out the Artwork of the Choke in realtime on CNN, got here throughout within the worst doable method: an unapologetic liar, prepared to say something — together with adopting President Trump’s personal insurance policies, and rhetoric — to get herself elected.
That is very true given her earlier, well-documented devotion to the Cult of Local weather Science, which was zealous and excessive. In 2020, if it had been as much as her, she would have wiped the oil and fuel producers off the face of a planet. Now, in fact, her handlers inform her to talk out of each side of her mouth to pander to what they hope are gullible voters. This explains Kamala’s garbled reply to Bash, professing that her “values haven’t modified,” though she now, apparently, helps fracking – at the very least till November 5th.
Will Pennsylvania voters purchase this? They actually shouldn’t. Her explanations – paired together with her off-putting, holier-than-thou angle – merely don’t make sense to anybody with an IQ above room temperature (and possibly even to these under the mendoza line). That apparently wasn’t sufficient. Incredulously from there, Kamala doubled down. She went on to really describe Joe Biden as an “clever man,” a number of occasions. That is the place, in fact, Kamala’s dishonesty was most illuminating: right here she revealed her playing cards as a traditional case of the woman doth protest an excessive amount of. Kamala’s lies are so brazen as to be unbelievable.
Not like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama earlier than her, and to a lesser extent, Joe Biden (at the very least when he was nonetheless semi-sentient), Kamala is a really poor pupil within the artwork of duplicity. She wouldn’t even probably register as an novice by most counts. For these causes, her falsehoods turned instantly obvious, a lot in order that you may nearly – nearly – forgive the scandalously biased Bash, representing her scandalously biased community, for not interrogating the Democratic candidate additional on the nonsense. Anybody with a pulse may detect it.
And if her lies in some way weren’t already apparent by the shiftiness of her responses, they need to have been discerned by her repeated self-contradictions that riddled just about each reply she mouthed, eroding the final of her credibility. The clearest case of this being her insistence that Joe Biden was – and stays – an clever(!) man, implying that he’s nonetheless able to remaining in workplace as president whereas she campaigns, though he was ousted in a coup – of which expensive Kamala dutifully performed a big half as co-conspirator – due to his lack of psychological marbles. However heaven forbid Kamala be requested to marketing campaign and govern as president on the similar time. Don’t black (Indian? Who is aware of!) womXn already bear sufficient of the world’s burdens! Heck, in her “warped” worldview, such an ask can be tantamount to a hate crime!
If not that, what different rationalization does Kamala Harris have for why she, and never ol’ Joe, was sitting earlier than Dana Bash for an interview about hers – not his —presidential marketing campaign? Alas, Dana Bash conveniently forgot to ask! Perhaps Joe’s amnesia is contagious and contaminated each mainstream community!
Democrats naturally love to decorate up the July coup leading to Biden’s ouster in language to the impact of “Joe stepped down for the nice of the nation,” characterizing it as a noble act of sacrifice and heroism, which the press, in flip, appears to at all times settle for as an incontrovertible article of religion. They by no means fail to miss essentially the most pure follow-up, particularly: what on earth prompted Joe to step down, just a little over three and a half months out from essentially the most consequential election in trendy American historical past, after being adamant about not doing so for months on finish, within the first place?
Intelligence and terminal dementia usually don’t go hand-in-hand. However Kamala’s repeated insistence that Joe Biden is “clever,” “so sensible” and “very robust” transmits the plain fact that he’s in truth not any of these issues. He’s completely incapable of dealing with the duties of his publish as a result of he doesn’t have the psychological capabilities to take action.
It’s a useless giveaway {that a} politician is mendacity once they should repeatedly describe an aged man riven by dementia — now acknowledged universally — as “sensible” and “clever,” each descriptions standing as assaults on cause and observable actuality itself. The reality is that Kamala aided and abetted the fraud of the century: Joe Biden’s senility. This fraud gravely endangers your complete nationwide safety of the nation, all finished to keep away from a connection to that fraud – which, in fact, remains to be ongoing.
That Kamala then had the audacity to say Biden, who unleashed hordes of unlawful aliens into our nation, helped restore our “sovereignty” and “territorial integrity” – and, on high of that, declare that the variety of immigrants “has truly decreased” – takes the artwork of mendacity to an entire new, absurd stage. Including insult to damage, she meshed her lies in an exceedingly dismissive and shamelessly condescending tone all through.
Performing like CNN was an adversarial outlet – and the mere act of asking inquiries to her, as coddled up as they had been, in some way crossed the road of professionalism, signifies a deeply insecure one who is definitely rattled, even in a discussion board as cloyingly pleasant as CNN’s little doubt is. Previously, this may disqualify an individual’s candidacy, no questions requested, as a result of an incapacity to deal with a painstakingly simple, softball interview demarcates the naked minimal of what a president is predicted to do.
May you think about an individual with Kamala’s exceptionally weak character and disposition coping with Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Bashar al-Assad or Kim Jong-un? After all not! Her dismissive tone betrays a elementary ignorance concerning the excessive tasks of the presidency, or – possibly even worse – showcases a callous indifference to its significance, an significance which incorporates its venerable historical past and the lofty requirements, imposed by custom, upon every one in every of its officeholders.
Whereas it’s true that it’s been a very long time coming, apart from Donald Trump’s 4 12 months stint, by which the presidential incumbent actually lived as much as the majesty of the workplace, it’s indeniable that if, God forbid, somebody like Kamala Harris had been to ever occupy that place, for all intents and functions the USA of America can be over. She harbors nothing however scorn, disdain, and resentment for the workplace, and callous disregard — within the type of her odious sense of entitlement — for the establishments enshrined by our Constitutional type of authorities.
It’s one factor to be blind to historical past, however it’s one other factor completely to be apathetic of our cultural traditions and customs – not even pretending to care to be taught extra or a lot as attempt to relate to your constituents in a significant, certainly human, method. Knowledge is present in admitting one’s ignorance; Kamala Harris strikes the portrait of a cutthroat politician, stuffed with pleasure and hubris and full disregard for the well-being of these over whom she seeks — intends — to rule.
Her election can be a nationwide shame and unmitigated catastrophe on so many fronts. Kamala’s interview with CNN reaffirms this truth – and once more, not that it was wanted, however underscores the extraordinarily excessive stakes of this presidential election, crucial in generations. One that can decide whether or not the USA of America will go on, or succumb to pleasure and ignorance, the perennial sins which have introduced mightier civilizations than ours to spoil. With candidates like Kamala Harris, who’re we to imagine we is not going to escape an analogous destiny?
